Alexander Ritschard vs Tennys Sandgren — Sarasota CH Round of 32

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI
Alexander Ritschard
#575ATP
1528ELO
1557Clay ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Ritschard A.
7-5 6-3
Sandgren T.
Ritschard A.
762
Sandgren T.
530

Alexander Ritschard defeated Tennys Sandgren 7-5 6-3 in the Sarasota CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ritschard A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ritschard A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ritschard A.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.4
8.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ritschard A.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Even
36
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
92
Break points won·Clear edge
14
2
Deciding sets·Clear edge
41
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
59
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ritschard A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sandgren T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.1
Surface form
1.7
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Galan D.[5]
Johnson S.[4]
7-674-66-1
Semi-finals
Galan D.[5]
Tabilo A.[3]
7-636-1
Johnson S.[4]
Kudla D.[1]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Galan D.[5]
Andreev A.
2-0
Tabilo A.[3]
Wolf J.
6-16-4
Johnson S.[4]
Krueger M.
7-643-66-3
Kudla D.[1]
Sock J.[7]
7-56-1
R16
Kudla D.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-21-66-3
Tabilo A.[3]
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Andreev A.
Wu T.
6-41-67-64
Sock J.[7]
Brouwer G.
6-16-2
Wolf J.
Galarneau A.
6-16-2
Galan D.[5]
Kubler J.
6-34-66-3
Krueger M.
Barrios Vera T.[8]
6-47-63
Johnson S.[4]
Watanuki Y.
3-66-46-1
R32
Mmoh M.
Harris A.
6-36-3
Watanuki Y.
Jung J.
6-26-2
Barrios Vera T.[8]
Nanda G.
6-26-1
Galan D.[5]
Purcell M.
7-57-64
Kubler J.
Nagal S.
4-66-26-3
Tabilo A.[3]
Rybakov A.
6-36-4
Ritschard A.
Sandgren T.
7-56-3
Sock J.[7]
Harrison C.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-46-2
Brouwer G.
Torpegaard M.
6-746-46-1
Andreev A.
Harrison R.
3-66-22-0
Galarneau A.
Londero J.[6]
6-31-0
Wu T.
Hijikata R.
7-643-66-4
Wolf J.
Kovacevic A.
6-26-786-3
Krueger M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-36-2
Johnson S.[4]
Collarini A.
6-36-4