Steve Johnson vs Denis Kudla — Sarasota CH Semi-final

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
USA4
Steve Johnson
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
USA1
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Johnson S.
6-2 7-5
Kudla D.
Johnson S.
672
Kudla D.
250

Steve Johnson defeated Denis Kudla 6-2 7-5 in the Sarasota CH semi-final on clay. Steve Johnson extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Steve Johnson closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-04-04HoustonR32claySteve Johnson6-3 4-6 6-4
2021-07-12NewportR32grassDenis Kudla7-6(3) 3-6 6-4
2018-01-15Australian OpenR128hardDenis Kudla6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(3) 6-2
2014-04-07HoustonR32claySteve Johnson6-3 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Johnson S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Kudla D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Johnson S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Johnson S.Kudla D.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
33%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.4
5.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (105 vs 167). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Johnson S.Kudla D.
Clutch Rating·Even
52
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
90
Break points won·Slight edge
10
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
81
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Johnson S.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kudla D.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
4.3
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
8.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Galan D.[5]
Johnson S.[4]
7-674-66-1
Semi-finals
Galan D.[5]
Tabilo A.[3]
7-636-1
Johnson S.[4]
Kudla D.[1]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Galan D.[5]
Andreev A.
2-0
Tabilo A.[3]
Wolf J.
6-16-4
Johnson S.[4]
Krueger M.
7-643-66-3
Kudla D.[1]
Sock J.[7]
7-56-1
R16
Kudla D.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-21-66-3
Tabilo A.[3]
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Andreev A.
Wu T.
6-41-67-64
Sock J.[7]
Brouwer G.
6-16-2
Wolf J.
Galarneau A.
6-16-2
Galan D.[5]
Kubler J.
6-34-66-3
Krueger M.
Barrios Vera T.[8]
6-47-63
Johnson S.[4]
Watanuki Y.
3-66-46-1
R32
Mmoh M.
Harris A.
6-36-3
Watanuki Y.
Jung J.
6-26-2
Barrios Vera T.[8]
Nanda G.
6-26-1
Galan D.[5]
Purcell M.
7-57-64
Kubler J.
Nagal S.
4-66-26-3
Tabilo A.[3]
Rybakov A.
6-36-4
Ritschard A.
Sandgren T.
7-56-3
Sock J.[7]
Harrison C.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-46-2
Brouwer G.
Torpegaard M.
6-746-46-1
Andreev A.
Harrison R.
3-66-22-0
Galarneau A.
Londero J.[6]
6-31-0
Wu T.
Hijikata R.
7-643-66-4
Wolf J.
Kovacevic A.
6-26-786-3
Krueger M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-36-2
Johnson S.[4]
Collarini A.
6-36-4