Denis Kudla vs Jack Sock — Sarasota CH Quarter-final

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA1
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
USA7
Jack Sock
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Kudla D.
7-5 6-1
Sock J.
Kudla D.
762
Sock J.
510

Denis Kudla defeated Jack Sock 7-5 6-1 in the Sarasota CH quarter-final on clay. Denis Kudla extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Denis Kudla came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-07-25Canada MastersR64hardJack Sock6-2 6-2
2015-10-26BaselR32hardJack Sock6-4 6-2
2015-07-27AtlantaR16hardDenis Kudla7-6(6) 6-3
2012-02-13San JoseR32hardDenis Kudla6-4 6-7(6) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sock J.

Sock J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Sock J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Even
5.5
6.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (167 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Sock J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
67
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
96
Break points won·Slight edge
19
28
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sock J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
8.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Galan D.[5]
Johnson S.[4]
7-674-66-1
Semi-finals
Galan D.[5]
Tabilo A.[3]
7-636-1
Johnson S.[4]
Kudla D.[1]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Galan D.[5]
Andreev A.
2-0
Tabilo A.[3]
Wolf J.
6-16-4
Johnson S.[4]
Krueger M.
7-643-66-3
Kudla D.[1]
Sock J.[7]
7-56-1
R16
Kudla D.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-21-66-3
Tabilo A.[3]
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Andreev A.
Wu T.
6-41-67-64
Sock J.[7]
Brouwer G.
6-16-2
Wolf J.
Galarneau A.
6-16-2
Galan D.[5]
Kubler J.
6-34-66-3
Krueger M.
Barrios Vera T.[8]
6-47-63
Johnson S.[4]
Watanuki Y.
3-66-46-1
R32
Mmoh M.
Harris A.
6-36-3
Watanuki Y.
Jung J.
6-26-2
Barrios Vera T.[8]
Nanda G.
6-26-1
Galan D.[5]
Purcell M.
7-57-64
Kubler J.
Nagal S.
4-66-26-3
Tabilo A.[3]
Rybakov A.
6-36-4
Ritschard A.
Sandgren T.
7-56-3
Sock J.[7]
Harrison C.
6-46-4
Kudla D.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
4-66-46-2
Brouwer G.
Torpegaard M.
6-746-46-1
Andreev A.
Harrison R.
3-66-22-0
Galarneau A.
Londero J.[6]
6-31-0
Wu T.
Hijikata R.
7-643-66-4
Wolf J.
Kovacevic A.
6-26-786-3
Krueger M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-36-2
Johnson S.[4]
Collarini A.
6-36-4