Andrey Rublev vs Tommy Paul — Hamburg Round of 16

Hamburg · ATP · Round of 16
Andrey Rublev
RUS5
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1872Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 September 2020
clay
Tommy Paul
USA
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1886Clay ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Rublev A.
6-1 3-6 6-2
Paul T.
Rublev A.
6362
Paul T.
1621

Andrey Rublev defeated Tommy Paul 6-1 3-6 6-2 in the Hamburg round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Andrey Rublev came in ranked #16, leading the head-to-head 4–1, defending last year's final. Andrey Rublev extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrey Rublev closed it out in three sets, 6–1 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

4–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-10-02Shanghai MastersR16hardAndrey Rublev7-5 7-5
2022-10-10GijonQFhardAndrey Rublev7-5 6-3
2021-10-04Indian Wells MastersR32hardTommy Paul6-4 3-6 7-5
2021-05-03Madrid MastersR32clayAndrey Rublev6-7(5) 6-3 6-4
2018-07-30WashingtonR32hardAndrey Rublev7-6(5) 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Paul T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Rublev A.Paul T.
13
Serve
33
64
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Paul T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Even
67%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
66%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.9
6.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Paul T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
88
93
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Clear edge
72
87
Deciding sets·Even
97
98
Tiebreaks·Even
92
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Paul T.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
91

Rublev A.: 15 days rest · Paul T.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
20°CClear
Wind 9 km/hHumidity 53%
Final
Rublev A.[5]
Tsitsipas S.[2]
6-43-67-5
Semi-finals
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Garin C.
7-53-66-4
Rublev A.[5]
Ruud C.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Ruud C.
Humbert U.
7-53-66-1
Rublev A.[5]
Bautista Agut R.[4]
6-27-5
Garin C.
Bublik A.
3-66-46-4
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Lajovic D.
7-656-2
R16
Humbert U.
Vesely J.
6-46-3
Bautista Agut R.[4]
Koepfer D.
6-33-66-3
Rublev A.[5]
Paul T.
6-13-66-2
Bublik A.
Auger Aliassime F.
6-46-2
Garin C.
Hanfmann Y.
6-27-63
Lajovic D.
Khachanov K.[8]
6-16-2
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Cuevas P.
7-56-4
Ruud C.
Fognini F.[6]
6-36-3
R32
Khachanov K.[8]
Struff J.
7-654-67-5
Ruud C.
Paire B.
6-42-0
Humbert U.
Medvedev D.[1]
6-46-3
Koepfer D.
Nishioka Y.
7-604-66-1
Hanfmann Y.
Monfils G.[3]
6-46-3
Cuevas P.
Fritz T.
6-46-2
Fognini F.[6]
Kohlschreiber P.
4-66-17-5
Vesely J.
Simon G.
7-56-2
Bautista Agut R.[4]
Basilashvili N.
6-46-3
Paul T.
Anderson K.
6-40-66-4
Rublev A.[5]
Sandgren T.
6-36-3
Bublik A.
Ramos A.
6-27-65
Auger Aliassime F.
Sonego L.
6-27-62
Garin C.
Nishikori K.
6-06-3
Lajovic D.
Mannarino A.
6-46-1
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Evans D.
6-36-1