Clement Chidekh vs William Jansen

Birmingham · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Semi-final

FRAQ

Clement Chidekh

#205ATP

1513ELO

1412Grass ELO

$92kYTD

$401kCAREER

25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed

Last 10 · pre-match

WWWWLLLLWW

2 — 0

Sets

Sunday, 31 May 2026 · 14:20

grass

CENTRE COURT · 3rd on

GBRWC

William Jansen

#1604ATP

21 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed

Last 10 · pre-match

LWWLLLLLLL

Chidekh C.

6-1 6-4

Jansen W.

Chidekh C.

662

Jansen W.

140

Clement Chidekh won five games in a row to see off William Jansen 6-1 6-4 in the Birmingham qualifying semi-final.

Key context

Set 1, game 2: Clement Chidekh broke serve.
Set 2, game 9: Clement Chidekh broke serve.
Pressure points: Clement Chidekh converted 3 of 5 break points; William Jansen converted 0 of 4 break points.

Pressure & serve by court

Chidekh C.

Jansen W.

Break points won

3/5

0/4

Break points saved

4/4

2/5

Break points from this match. Serve-by-court shows the share of service points won from each side of the court; the court side alternates every point.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season

Chidekh C.serving91% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Jansen W.

Jansen W.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Chidekh C.

Serve advantage — Chidekh C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season

Chidekh C.Jansen W.

1st serve in·Clear edge

64%

51%

1st serve points won·Clear edge

70%

57%

2nd serve points won·Slight edge

50%

55%

Service points won·Slight edge

63%

56%

Return points won·Clear edge

41%

23%

Break points saved·Clear edge

60%

40%

Aces / match·Slight edge

3.6

5.0

Double faults / match·Clear edge

2.9

2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match

Chidekh C.

5.6

Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited

Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)

Jansen W.

5.1

Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited

Form & Matchup

5.0No prior meetings

H2H

5.0No prior meetings

8.16 of last 8 on grass

Surface form

0.0Lost last 2

Win streak

0.0Lost last 6

Fatigue & Travel

3.0Clay → Grass

Surface transition

Context

5.0Didn't play here last year

Defending pts

5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.