James Beaven vs Charles Broom

Birmingham · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Semi-final

GBRWC

James Beaven

#1201ATP

21 yrs

Last 10 · pre-match

0 — 2

Sets

Sunday, 31 May 2026 · 13:50

grass

COURT 4 · 3rd on

GBR10

Charles Broom

#285ATP

1409ELO

1386Grass ELO

28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed

Last 10 · pre-match

LLWWLWWLLW

Beaven J.

3-6 2-6

Broom C.

Beaven J.

320

Broom C.

662

Charles Broom reeled off five straight games on the way to a 6-3 6-2 win over James Beaven in the Birmingham qualifying semi-final.

Key context

Set 1, game 6: A 15-point game with five deuces went James Beaven's way.
Set 2, game 3: Charles Broom broke serve.
Pressure points: James Beaven converted 1 of 1 break points; Charles Broom converted 4 of 14 break points.

Pressure & serve by court

Beaven J.

Broom C.

Break points won

1/1

4/14

Break points saved

10/14

0/1

Break points from this match. Serve-by-court shows the share of service points won from each side of the court; the court side alternates every point.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season

Beaven J.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Beaven J.

Serve advantage — Broom C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season

Beaven J.Broom C.

1st serve in·Even

61%

64%

1st serve points won·Clear edge

59%

77%

2nd serve points won·Clear edge

35%

54%

Service points won·Clear edge

49%

68%

Return points won·Slight edge

29%

38%

Break points saved·Slight edge

71%

65%

Aces / match·Dominant

2.0

8.3

Double faults / match·Dominant

0.0

1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (1 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match

Beaven J.

6.4

Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited

Broom C.

5.0

Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited

Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)

Form & Matchup

5.0No prior meetings

H2H

5.0No prior meetings

Surface form

3.53 of last 10 on grass

Win streak

0.0Lost last 3

Fatigue & Travel

3-set count

7.01 three-setter in 14 days

Surface transition

3.0Clay → Grass

Context

5.0Didn't play here last year

Defending pts

5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.