Martin Damm vs Max Basing — Birmingham Qualifying Semi-final

Birmingham · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Semi-final

USALL

Martin Damm

#106ATP

1706ELO

1660Grass ELO

$338kYTD

$910kCAREER

22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed

Last 10 · pre-match

LWLWWLWWWL

2 — 0

Sets

Sunday, 31 May 2026 · 10:45

grass

Court 4 · 1st on

GBR

Max Basing

#329ATP

23 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed

Last 10 · pre-match

WWLWWWLLLL

Damm M.

6-1 7-5

Basing M.

Damm M.

672

Basing M.

150

Martin Damm won five games in a row to see off Max Basing 6-1 7-5 in the Birmingham qualifying semi-final.

Key context

Set 1, game 4: Martin Damm broke serve.
Set 2, game 11: Martin Damm broke serve.
Pressure points: Martin Damm converted 3 of 6 break points; Max Basing converted 0 of 0 break points.

Pressure & serve by court

Damm M.

Basing M.

Break points won

3/6

—

Break points saved

—

3/6

Break points from this match. Serve-by-court shows the share of service points won from each side of the court; the court side alternates every point.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season

Damm M.serving96% hold

wins 77% of points on serve vs Basing M.

Basing M.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season

Damm M.Basing M.

1st serve in·Slight edge

63%

68%

1st serve points won·Clear edge

79%

61%

2nd serve points won·Even

52%

53%

Service points won·Slight edge

69%

58%

Return points won·Slight edge

32%

21%

Break points saved·Clear edge

63%

50%

Aces / match·Dominant

12.3

0.0

Double faults / match·Dominant

3.8

1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (34 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match

Damm M.

5.5

Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited

Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)

Basing M.

5.7

Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited

Form & Matchup

5.0No prior meetings

H2H

5.0No prior meetings

0.0Lost last 2

Win streak

0.0

Fatigue & Travel

3.0Clay → Grass

Surface transition

7.0Hard → Grass

Context

5.0Didn't play here last year

Defending pts

5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.