Felix Auger Aliassime vs Casper Ruud — Monte Carlo Masters Round of 16

Monte Carlo Masters · ATP · Round of 16
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN6
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1864Clay ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Sunday, 5 April 2026
clay
Casper Ruud
NOR9
Casper Ruud
#12ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
Auger Aliassime F.
7-5 2-2
Ruud C.
Auger Aliassime F.
72–
Ruud C.
52–

Felix Auger Aliassime advanced when Casper Ruud retired 7-5 2-2 in the Monte Carlo Masters round of 16. Felix Auger Aliassime extended the head-to-head to 5–3.

Head to head

4–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-08-12Cincinnati MastersR32hardFelix Auger Aliassime6-3 6-1
2024-07-29Paris OlympicsQFclayFelix Auger Aliassime6-4 6-7(8) 6-3
2024-04-22Madrid MastersR16clayFelix Auger Aliassime6-4 7-5
2022-11-14Tour FinalsRRhardCasper Ruud7-6(4) 6-4
2022-08-08Canada MastersQFhardCasper Ruud6-1 6-2
2021-05-03Madrid MastersR64clayCasper Ruud6-1 6-4
2019-03-18Miami MastersR128hardFelix Auger Aliassime3-6 6-1 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Auger Aliassime F.serving92% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Ruud C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Auger Aliassime F.Ruud C.
—
Serve
54
—
Return
69

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Auger Aliassime F.Ruud C.
1st serve in·Even
68%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
57%
Service points won·Even
71%
67%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
72%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.9
7.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Auger Aliassime F.Ruud C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
84
91
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Dominant
50
75
Deciding sets·Even
99
99
Tiebreaks·Even
99
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Auger Aliassime F.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Ruud C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.2Clay Elo 1864
Surface ELO
5.8+109 Clay Elo edge
5.6Overall Elo 1958
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1983
10.0
H2H
0.0
3.5
Surface form
6.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Auger Aliassime F.Ruud C.
Freshness·Dominant
59
97

Auger Aliassime F.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 112 games (7d) · Ruud C.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
19°CMainly clear
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 48%
Final
Sinner J.[2]
Alcaraz C.[1]
7-656-3
Semi-finals
Alcaraz C.[1]
Vacherot V.
6-46-4
Sinner J.[2]
Zverev A.[3]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Vacherot V.
De Minaur A.[5]
6-43-66-3
Sinner J.[2]
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
6-36-4
Alcaraz C.[1]
Bublik A.[8]
6-36-0
Zverev A.[3]
Fonseca J.
7-56-736-3
R16
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
Ruud C.[9]
7-52-2
De Minaur A.[5]
Blockx A.
7-57-64
Fonseca J.
Berrettini M.
6-36-2
Vacherot V.
Hurkacz H.
6-746-36-4
Zverev A.[3]
Bergs Z.
6-27-5
Bublik A.[8]
Lehecka J.[11]
6-27-5
Alcaraz C.[1]
Etcheverry T.
6-14-66-3
Sinner J.[2]
Machac T.
6-16-736-3
R32
Blockx A.
Cobolli F.[10]
6-36-3
Machac T.
Cerundolo F.[16]
7-626-3
De Minaur A.[5]
Norrie C.
7-652-66-2
Lehecka J.[11]
Tabilo A.
4-67-646-3
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
Cilic M.
7-646-3
Berrettini M.
Medvedev D.[7]
6-06-0
Bergs Z.
Rublev A.[13]
6-46-1
Bublik A.[8]
Monfils G.
6-46-4
Etcheverry T.
Atmane T.
3-66-36-2
Ruud C.[9]
Moutet C.
7-56-3
Hurkacz H.
Marozsan F.
6-26-3
Zverev A.[3]
Garin C.
4-66-47-5
Vacherot V.
Musetti L.[4]
7-667-5
Alcaraz C.[1]
Baez S.
6-16-3
Fonseca J.
Rinderknech A.
7-54-66-3
Sinner J.[2]
Humbert U.
6-36-0
R64
Berrettini M.
Bautista Agut R.
4-0
Rinderknech A.
Khachanov K.[12]
7-56-2
Moutet C.
Muller A.
6-46-1
Tabilo A.
Fucsovics M.
6-46-3
Cilic M.
Shevchenko A.
6-16-3
Hurkacz H.
Darderi L.[15]
7-645-76-1
Marozsan F.
Dzumhur D.
6-26-1
Baez S.
Wawrinka S.
7-57-5
Cobolli F.[10]
Comesana F.
7-52-66-3
Vacherot V.
Cerundolo J.
5-76-26-1
Cerundolo F.[16]
Tsitsipas S.
7-56-4
Fonseca J.
Diallo G.
6-26-3
Humbert U.
Kouame M.
6-37-5
Monfils G.
Griekspoor T.
6-776-16-4
Lehecka J.[11]
Nava E.
7-616-786-2
Ruud C.[9]
Popyrin A.
6-36-4
Rublev A.[13]
Borges N.
6-41-66-1
Norrie C.
Kecmanovic M.
6-24-67-60
Machac T.
Altmaier D.
6-41-66-3
Bergs Z.
Mannarino A.
6-46-3
Atmane T.
Quinn E.
6-16-4
Blockx A.
Shapovalov D.
6-44-66-3
Garin C.
Arnaldi M.
6-26-4
Etcheverry T.
Dimitrov G.
6-42-66-3