Casper Ruud vs Felix Auger Aliassime — Canada Masters Quarter-final

Canada Masters · ATP · Quarter-final
Casper Ruud
NOR4
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1889Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 August 2022
hard
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN6
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1932Hard ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
Ruud C.
6-1 6-2
Auger Aliassime F.
Ruud C.
662
Auger Aliassime F.
120

Casper Ruud defeated Felix Auger Aliassime 6-1 6-2 in the Canada Masters quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Felix Auger Aliassime came in ranked #4, leading the head-to-head 5–2, defending last year's round of 32, but Casper Ruud had arrived on a 4-match winning run. Casper Ruud narrowed the head-to-head to 5–3.

Key context

Head to head

2–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-04-05Monte Carlo MastersR16clayFelix Auger Aliassime7-5 2-2 RET
2024-08-12Cincinnati MastersR32hardFelix Auger Aliassime6-3 6-1
2024-07-29Paris OlympicsQFclayFelix Auger Aliassime6-4 6-7(8) 6-3
2024-04-22Madrid MastersR16clayFelix Auger Aliassime6-4 7-5
2022-11-14Tour FinalsRRhardCasper Ruud7-6(4) 6-4
2021-05-03Madrid MastersR64clayCasper Ruud6-1 6-4
2019-03-18Miami MastersR128hardFelix Auger Aliassime3-6 6-1 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Auger Aliassime F.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruud C.Auger Aliassime F.
59
Serve
74
31
Return
44

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Auger Aliassime F.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
68%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
66%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
9.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Auger Aliassime F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
91
84
Break points saved·Even
99
100
Break points won·Dominant
75
50
Deciding sets·Even
99
99
Tiebreaks·Even
97
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruud C.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Auger Aliassime F.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.0Hard Elo 1889
Surface ELO
6.0+44 Hard Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1983
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1958
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
5.8
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.3
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Country comfort
6.6
6.0
Surface transition
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Auger Aliassime F.
Freshness·Dominant
98
64

Ruud C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Auger Aliassime F.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 57 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
27°CDrizzle
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 72%
Final
Carreno Busta P.
Hurkacz H.[8]
3-66-36-3
Semi-finals
Hurkacz H.[8]
Ruud C.[4]
5-76-36-2
Carreno Busta P.
Evans D.
7-56-776-2
Quarter-finals
Hurkacz H.[8]
Kyrgios N.
7-646-756-1
Ruud C.[4]
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
6-16-2
Carreno Busta P.
Draper J.
7-646-1
Evans D.
Paul T.
1-66-36-4
R16
Kyrgios N.
De Minaur A.
6-26-3
Hurkacz H.[8]
Ramos A.
6-766-27-63
Ruud C.[4]
Bautista Agut R.[14]
6-747-646-4
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
Norrie C.[9]
6-36-4
Carreno Busta P.
Sinner J.[7]
6-26-4
Evans D.
Fritz T.[10]
7-651-67-5
Paul T.
Cilic M.[13]
6-46-2
Draper J.
Monfils G.[17]
6-20-2
R32
Kyrgios N.
Medvedev D.[1]
6-726-46-2
De Minaur A.
Dimitrov G.[15]
7-647-5
Ramos A.
Schwartzman D.[12]
6-46-2
Hurkacz H.[8]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-36-746-2
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
Nishioka Y.
7-666-4
Sinner J.[7]
Mannarino A.
2-66-46-2
Carreno Busta P.
Rune H.
6-06-3
Draper J.
Tsitsipas S.[3]
7-57-64
Evans D.
Rublev A.[5]
6-46-4
Fritz T.[10]
Tiafoe F.
5-76-16-4
Monfils G.[17]
Cressy M.
7-6107-66
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Brooksby J.
7-56-1
Paul T.
Alcaraz C.[2]
6-747-676-3
Ruud C.[4]
Molcan A.
7-636-3
Norrie C.[9]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-16-2
Cilic M.[13]
Khachanov K.
6-36-2
R64
Cressy M.
Karatsev A.
6-46-4
Kyrgios N.
Baez S.
6-46-4
De Minaur A.
Shapovalov D.
7-57-64
Dimitrov G.[15]
Galarneau A.
6-47-5
Schwartzman D.[12]
Davidovich Fokina A.
1-66-36-4
Ramos A.
Goffin D.
7-626-2
Molcan A.
Mcdonald M.
7-616-4
Brooksby J.
Bublik A.
6-26-3
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Giron M.
7-656-3
Norrie C.[9]
Nakashima B.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Kecmanovic M.
6-17-5
Nishioka Y.
Paire B.
6-26-3
Mannarino A.
Rinderknech A.
6-36-3
Carreno Busta P.
Berrettini M.[11]
6-36-2
Monfils G.[17]
Martinez P.
7-643-66-2
Draper J.
Gaston H.
6-26-3
Evans D.
Krajinovic F.
6-21-66-0
Tiafoe F.
Bonzi B.
6-767-56-3
Fritz T.[10]
Murray A.
6-16-3
Cilic M.[13]
Coric B.
6-36-2
Khachanov K.
Cerundolo F.
7-645-76-3
Paul T.
Pospisil V.
6-46-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Wawrinka S.
6-33-66-3
Rune H.
Fognini F.
6-37-5