Felix Auger Aliassime vs Casper Ruud — Cincinnati Masters Round of 32

Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Round of 32
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1932Hard ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 August 2024
hard
Casper Ruud
NOR7
Casper Ruud
#12ATP
1983ELO
1889Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
Auger Aliassime F.
6-3 6-1
Ruud C.
Auger Aliassime F.
662
Ruud C.
310

Felix Auger Aliassime defeated Casper Ruud 6-3 6-1 in the Cincinnati Masters round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Felix Auger Aliassime came in ranked #4, leading the head-to-head 4–3, defending last year's round of 32. Felix Auger Aliassime extended the head-to-head to 5–3.

Key context

Head to head

4–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-04-05Monte Carlo MastersR16clayFelix Auger Aliassime7-5 2-2 RET
2024-07-29Paris OlympicsQFclayFelix Auger Aliassime6-4 6-7(8) 6-3
2024-04-22Madrid MastersR16clayFelix Auger Aliassime6-4 7-5
2022-11-14Tour FinalsRRhardCasper Ruud7-6(4) 6-4
2022-08-08Canada MastersQFhardCasper Ruud6-1 6-2
2021-05-03Madrid MastersR64clayCasper Ruud6-1 6-4
2019-03-18Miami MastersR128hardFelix Auger Aliassime3-6 6-1 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Auger Aliassime F.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Ruud C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Auger Aliassime F.Ruud C.
74
Serve
59
44
Return
31

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Auger Aliassime F.Ruud C.
1st serve in·Even
66%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Even
68%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.4
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (156 vs 146). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Auger Aliassime F.Ruud C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
84
91
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Dominant
50
75
Deciding sets·Even
99
99
Tiebreaks·Even
99
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Auger Aliassime F.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Ruud C.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.0+44 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1889
5.6Overall Elo 1958
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1983
0.0
H2H
10.0
3.6
Surface form
6.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
8.8
4.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
5.5
Country comfort
5.2
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Auger Aliassime F.Ruud C.
Freshness·Dominant
53
97

Auger Aliassime F.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 112 games (7d) · Ruud C.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
24°CClear
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 47%
Final
Sinner J.[1]
Tiafoe F.
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Sinner J.[1]
Zverev A.[3]
7-695-77-64
Tiafoe F.
Rune H.[15]
4-66-17-64
Quarter-finals
Tiafoe F.
Hurkacz H.[5]
6-30-0
Sinner J.[1]
Rublev A.[6]
4-67-56-4
Zverev A.[3]
Shelton B.[12]
3-67-637-5
Rune H.[15]
Draper J.
6-46-2
R16
Sinner J.[1]
Thompson J.
W/O
Hurkacz H.[5]
Cobolli F.
6-33-66-1
Tiafoe F.
Lehecka J.
6-46-7107-65
Rublev A.[6]
Nakashima B.
7-656-1
Zverev A.[3]
Carreno Busta P.
7-57-66
Shelton B.[12]
Marozsan F.
6-46-3
Draper J.
Auger Aliassime F.
5-76-46-4
Rune H.[15]
Monfils G.
3-66-36-4
R32
Nakashima B.
Fils A.
7-57-63
Cobolli F.
Darderi L.
7-643-1
Marozsan F.
Dimitrov G.[8]
4-66-46-3
Hurkacz H.[5]
Nishioka Y.
3-67-646-1
Rublev A.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-46-3
Zverev A.[3]
Khachanov K.
6-36-2
Carreno Busta P.
Purcell M.
6-36-3
Shelton B.[12]
Etcheverry T.
6-767-676-3
Lehecka J.
Medvedev D.[4]
7-626-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Ruud C.[7]
6-36-1
Draper J.
Tsitsipas S.[9]
3-66-47-5
Rune H.[15]
Borges N.
6-37-68
Monfils G.
Alcaraz C.[2]
4-67-656-4
Tiafoe F.
Musetti L.[14]
6-36-2
Sinner J.[1]
Michelsen A.
6-47-5
Thompson J.
Baez S.
6-26-4
R64
Baez S.
Giron M.
6-45-77-66
Thompson J.
Humbert U.[13]
3-66-37-64
Shelton B.[12]
Opelka R.
7-637-63
Purcell M.
Machac T.
6-47-61
Cobolli F.
Paul T.[10]
6-24-67-5
Lehecka J.
Navone M.
7-636-3
Nakashima B.
Fritz T.[11]
6-44-67-64
Draper J.
Munar J.
7-53-67-65
Fils A.
Holt B.
6-46-1
Zhang Z.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-37-64
Khachanov K.
Cerundolo F.
6-06-3
Carreno Busta P.
Korda S.[16]
7-56-1
Marozsan F.
Moutet C.
6-47-62
Nishioka Y.
Kecmanovic M.
6-47-5
Darderi L.
Tabilo A.
6-37-65
Musetti L.[14]
Jarry N.
4-67-657-64
Tiafoe F.
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-37-66
Auger Aliassime F.
Kovacevic A.
6-36-1
Tsitsipas S.[9]
Struff J.
4-66-46-3
Rune H.[15]
Berrettini M.
2-66-16-4
Borges N.
Mannarino A.
6-43-66-1
Monfils G.
Popyrin A.
7-56-3
Etcheverry T.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-736-2
Michelsen A.
Griekspoor T.
6-15-76-2