Coco Gauff vs Belinda BencicMiami Quarter-final

Miami · WTA · Quarter-final
#7WTA
2071ELO
2035Hard ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Tuesday, 17 March 2026
hard
#11WTA
1989ELO
1952Hard ELO
$1.8MYTD
$17MCAREER
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWWLL
Gauff C.
6-3 1-6 6-3
Bencic B.
Gauff C.
6162
Bencic B.
3631

Coco Gauff defeated Belinda Bencic 6-3 1-6 6-3 in the Miami quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Coco Gauff came in ranked #7, leading the head-to-head 5–2, defending last year's round of 16. Coco Gauff extended the head-to-head to 6–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Coco Gauff closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 6–3.

Head to head

52
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-07-05WimbledonR16grassCoco Gauff6-4 3-6 4-6
2025-09-24BeijingR16hardCoco Gauff4-6 7-6(4) 6-2
2025-04-22MadridR16clayCoco Gauff6-4 6-2
2025-03-05Indian WellsR16hardBelinda Bencic3-6 6-3 6-4
2025-01-13Australian OpenR16hardCoco Gauff5-7 6-2 6-1
2023-07-31WashingtonQFhardCoco Gauff6-1 6-2
2021-02-22AdelaideSFhardBelinda Bencic7-6(2) 6-7(4) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Gauff C.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Bencic B.

Bencic B.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gauff C.Bencic B.
25
Serve
57
100
Return
55

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
39%
48%
Service points won·Even
57%
60%
Return points won·Even
47%
45%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
7.4
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (17 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
99
89
Break points saved·Even
96
95
Break points won·Slight edge
100
94
Deciding sets·Even
100
98
Tiebreaks·Even
99
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+82 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Hard Elo 1952
6.2Overall Elo 2071
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1989
7.3
H2H
2.7
6.1
Surface form
6.9
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
7.3
Prev. match
9.0
7.9
Country comfort
5.7
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Dominant
54
79

Gauff C.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d) · Bencic B.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 29 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
19°COvercast
Wind 10 km/hHumidity 79%

Draw