Casper Ruud vs Marcos Giron — Delray Beach Round of 16

Delray Beach · ATP · Round of 16
Casper Ruud
NOR2
Casper Ruud
#12ATP
1983ELO
1889Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2026
hard
Marcos Giron
USA
Marcos Giron
#92ATP
1718ELO
1704Hard ELO
$495kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLWL
Ruud C.
4-6 7-6 6-4
Giron M.
Ruud C.
47862
Giron M.
66641

Casper Ruud defeated Marcos Giron 4-6 7-6 6-4 in the Delray Beach round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #12. Casper Ruud extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-03-05Indian Wells MastersR64hardMarcos Giron7-6(4) 3-6 6-2
2024-02-19Los CabosR16hardCasper Ruud6-1 6-0
2023-10-16TokyoR16hardMarcos Giron6-3 6-4
2021-11-01Paris MastersR16hardCasper Ruud6-2 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Giron M.

Giron M.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruud C.Giron M.
59
Serve
29
31
Return
45

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Giron M.
1st serve in·Even
67%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
56%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
72%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.2
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 25). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Giron M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
62
Break points saved·Even
99
98
Break points won·Dominant
75
42
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
56
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
97
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruud C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Giron M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+184 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Hard Elo 1704
6.9Overall Elo 1983
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1718
3.3
H2H
6.7
5.3
Surface form
5.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.5
3-set count
7.0
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Giron M.
Freshness·Clear edge
97
85

Ruud C.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Giron M.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Korda S.
Paul T.[5]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Paul T.[5]
Tien L.[4]
4-66-46-3
Korda S.
Cobolli F.[3]
7-616-1
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.[3]
Wong C.
7-56-776-2
Korda S.
Ruud C.[2]
4-66-26-2
Tien L.[4]
Tiafoe F.[8]
7-653-67-5
Paul T.[5]
Fritz T.[1]
6-46-3
R16
Cobolli F.[3]
Atmane T.
7-56-4
Tien L.[4]
Kecmanovic M.
6-46-747-65
Fritz T.[1]
Jodar R.
7-646-4
Ruud C.[2]
Giron M.
4-67-666-4
Tiafoe F.[8]
Svajda Z.
6-43-67-5
Wong C.
Nakashima B.[7]
6-47-64
Paul T.[5]
Walton A.
7-6116-3
Korda S.
Michelsen A.
6-37-66
R32
Nakashima B.[7]
Cilic M.
7-647-65
Paul T.[5]
Moutet C.
4-66-36-4
Walton A.
Diallo G.
7-646-3
Wong C.
Borges N.
7-654-66-3
Kecmanovic M.
Bellucci M.
6-16-4
Tiafoe F.[8]
Hijikata R.
6-46-4
Atmane T.
Kypson P.
6-32-66-4
Svajda Z.
Kovacevic A.
7-646-3
Giron M.
Shimabukuro S.
6-37-5
Michelsen A.
Vacherot V.[6]
7-646-4
Jodar R.
Quinn E.
6-26-3
Korda S.
Mcdonald M.
6-47-5