Casper Ruud vs Marcos Giron — Los Cabos Round of 16

Los Cabos · ATP · Round of 16
Casper Ruud
NOR4
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1889Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 February 2024
hard
Marcos Giron
USA
Marcos Giron
#87ATP
1718ELO
1704Hard ELO
$495kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLWL
Ruud C.
6-1 6-0
Giron M.
Ruud C.
662
Giron M.
100

Casper Ruud defeated Marcos Giron 6-1 6-0 in the Los Cabos round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #13. Casper Ruud extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-16Delray BeachR16hardCasper Ruud4-6 7-6(6) 6-4
2025-03-05Indian Wells MastersR64hardMarcos Giron7-6(4) 3-6 6-2
2023-10-16TokyoR16hardMarcos Giron6-3 6-4
2021-11-01Paris MastersR16hardCasper Ruud6-2 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Giron M.

Giron M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruud C.Giron M.
59
Serve
29
31
Return
45

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Giron M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.0
5.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Giron M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
62
Break points saved·Even
99
98
Break points won·Dominant
75
42
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
56
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
97
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruud C.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Giron M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+184 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Hard Elo 1704
6.9Overall Elo 1983
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1718
4.6
H2H
5.4
7.5
Surface form
7.4
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
0.9
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Giron M.
Freshness·Slight edge
98
87

Ruud C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Giron M.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[8]
Ruud C.[4]
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Zverev A.[1]
7-54-67-62
Ruud C.[4]
Tsitsipas S.[2]
6-47-64
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Michelsen A.
0-67-617-5
Zverev A.[1]
Kokkinakis T.
6-36-4
Ruud C.[4]
Borges N.
6-36-2
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Kovacevic A.
7-616-3
R16
Ruud C.[4]
Giron M.
6-16-0
Kovacevic A.
Hijikata R.
6-34-66-4
Zverev A.[1]
Nishioka Y.
6-36-0
Kokkinakis T.
Evans D.
6-46-2
Michelsen A.
De Minaur A.[3]
6-46-1
Borges N.
Purcell M.[7]
6-36-3
Thompson J.[8]
Nava E.
7-656-3
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Vukic A.
6-36-0
R32
Vukic A.
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-657-610
Kovacevic A.
Holt B.
6-16-4
Giron M.
Daniel T.
6-47-5
Nishioka Y.
Cobolli F.
6-16-0
Michelsen A.
Lestienne C.
6-37-63
Purcell M.[7]
Arnaldi M.
6-44-66-4
Kokkinakis T.
Draper J.
4-67-656-4
Evans D.
Safiullin R.[5]
6-26-4
Nava E.
Schwartzman D.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[8]
Escobedo E.
6-46-3
Borges N.
Koepfer D.
7-626-2
Hijikata R.
Kecmanovic M.[6]
6-37-62