Felix Auger Aliassime vs Daniel Altmaier — Paris Masters Round of 16

Paris Masters · ATP · Round of 16
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN9
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1932Hard ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2025
hard
Daniel Altmaier
GER
Daniel Altmaier
#61ATP
1734ELO
1652Hard ELO
$574kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLL
Auger Aliassime F.
3-6 6-3 6-2
Altmaier D.
Auger Aliassime F.
3662
Altmaier D.
6321

Felix Auger Aliassime defeated Daniel Altmaier 3-6 6-3 6-2 in the Paris Masters round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Felix Auger Aliassime came in ranked #4. Felix Auger Aliassime extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-26Roland GarrosR128clayFelix Auger Aliassime4-6 6-4 4-6 6-1 7.10-6.7
2025-05-18HamburgR32clayFelix Auger Aliassime6-3 6-3
2025-04-07Monte Carlo MastersR64clayDaniel Altmaier7-6(5) 6-3
2024-01-08AucklandR16hardDaniel Altmaier7-6(9) 7-5
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Auger Aliassime F.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Altmaier D.

Altmaier D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Auger Aliassime F.Altmaier D.
74
Serve
17
44
Return
4

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Auger Aliassime F.Altmaier D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.0
7.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (97 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Auger Aliassime F.Altmaier D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
84
71
Break points saved·Even
100
96
Break points won·Clear edge
50
34
Deciding sets·Slight edge
99
92
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
99
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Auger Aliassime F.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Altmaier D.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.0+281 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.0Hard Elo 1652
8.7Overall Elo 1958
ELO gap
1.3Overall Elo 1734
0.0
H2H
10.0
8.0
Surface form
2.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
1.4
Minutes 14d
7.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
5.7
Country comfort
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Auger Aliassime F.Altmaier D.
Freshness·Dominant
59
94

Auger Aliassime F.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 112 games (7d) · Altmaier D.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
13°CDrizzle
Wind 19 km/hHumidity 82%
Final
Sinner J.[2]
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Sinner J.[2]
Zverev A.[3]
6-06-1
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
Bublik A.[13]
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
Vacherot V.
6-26-2
Bublik A.[13]
De Minaur A.[6]
6-756-47-5
Sinner J.[2]
Shelton B.[5]
6-36-3
Zverev A.[3]
Medvedev D.[11]
2-66-37-65
R16
Shelton B.[5]
Rublev A.[12]
7-666-3
De Minaur A.[6]
Khachanov K.[10]
6-26-2
Zverev A.[3]
Davidovich Fokina A.[15]
6-26-4
Sinner J.[2]
Cerundolo F.
7-56-1
Medvedev D.[11]
Sonego L.
3-67-656-4
Vacherot V.
Norrie C.
7-646-4
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
Altmaier D.
3-66-36-2
Bublik A.[13]
Fritz T.[4]
7-656-2
R32
Medvedev D.[11]
Dimitrov G.
W/O
Shelton B.[5]
Cobolli F.
7-646-3
Cerundolo F.
Kecmanovic M.
7-51-67-64
Sinner J.[2]
Bergs Z.
6-46-2
Rublev A.[12]
Tien L.
6-46-4
De Minaur A.[6]
Diallo G.
7-684-66-3
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
Muller A.
5-77-657-64
Vacherot V.
Rinderknech A.
6-796-36-4
Altmaier D.
Ruud C.[8]
6-37-5
Davidovich Fokina A.[15]
Cazaux A.
7-656-4
Sonego L.
Musetti L.[7]
3-66-36-1
Norrie C.
Alcaraz C.[1]
4-66-36-4
Fritz T.[4]
Vukic A.
7-646-2
Bublik A.[13]
Moutet C.
6-37-5
Zverev A.[3]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-756-17-5
Khachanov K.[10]
Fonseca J.
6-13-66-3
R64
Cazaux A.
Darderi L.
7-657-64
Rinderknech A.
Marozsan F.
7-657-64
Vacherot V.
Lehecka J.[14]
6-16-3
Muller A.
Nakashima B.
6-27-5
Bublik A.[13]
Popyrin A.
6-46-3
Bergs Z.
Michelsen A.
6-32-66-2
Ugo Carabelli C.
Etcheverry T.
7-56-3
Diallo G.
Griekspoor T.
6-36-4
Fonseca J.
Shapovalov D.
5-76-46-3
Dimitrov G.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-656-1
Medvedev D.[11]
Munar J.
6-16-3
Tien L.
Borges N.
6-27-67
Cerundolo F.
Dzumhur D.
6-36-3
Sonego L.
Korda S.
6-26-3
Cobolli F.
Machac T.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.
Giron M.
6-27-65
Vukic A.
Atmane T.
6-42-66-4
Norrie C.
Baez S.
6-36-4
Rublev A.[12]
Fearnley J.
6-16-4
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
Comesana F.
6-726-36-3
Kecmanovic M.
Kovacevic A.
6-41-67-62
Moutet C.
Opelka R.
3-67-56-1
Davidovich Fokina A.[15]
Royer V.
4-66-16-4
Khachanov K.[10]
Quinn E.
6-16-1