Daniel Altmaier vs Felix Auger Aliassime — Monte Carlo Masters Round of 64

Monte Carlo Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Daniel Altmaier
GER
Daniel Altmaier
#60ATP
1734ELO
1693Clay ELO
$574kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 April 2025
clay
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN16
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1864Clay ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
Altmaier D.
7-6 6-3
Auger Aliassime F.
Altmaier D.
7762
Auger Aliassime F.
6530

Daniel Altmaier defeated Felix Auger Aliassime 7-6 6-3 in the Monte Carlo Masters round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Felix Auger Aliassime came in ranked #4, leading the head-to-head 3–1, defending last year's round of 32. Daniel Altmaier narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-26Roland GarrosR128clayFelix Auger Aliassime4-6 6-4 4-6 6-1 7.10-6.7
2025-10-27Paris MastersR16hardFelix Auger Aliassime3-6 6-3 6-2
2025-05-18HamburgR32clayFelix Auger Aliassime6-3 6-3
2024-01-08AucklandR16hardDaniel Altmaier7-6(9) 7-5
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Altmaier D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Auger Aliassime F.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Altmaier D.

Serve advantage — Auger Aliassime F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Altmaier D.Auger Aliassime F.
41
Serve
—
12
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Altmaier D.Auger Aliassime F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
77%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
69%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.0
10.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (88 vs 97). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Altmaier D.Auger Aliassime F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
71
84
Break points saved·Even
96
100
Break points won·Clear edge
34
50
Deciding sets·Slight edge
92
99
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
82
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Altmaier D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Auger Aliassime F.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.4Clay Elo 1693
Surface ELO
7.6+171 Clay Elo edge
1.3Overall Elo 1734
ELO gap
8.7Overall Elo 1958
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
7.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Altmaier D.Auger Aliassime F.
Freshness·Dominant
95
64

Altmaier D.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Auger Aliassime F.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 57 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
15°COvercast
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 46%
Final
Alcaraz C.[2]
Musetti L.[13]
3-66-16-0
Semi-finals
Musetti L.[13]
De Minaur A.[8]
1-66-47-64
Alcaraz C.[2]
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-626-4
Quarter-finals
De Minaur A.[8]
Dimitrov G.[15]
6-06-0
Davidovich Fokina A.
Popyrin A.
6-36-2
Alcaraz C.[2]
Fils A.[12]
4-67-56-3
Musetti L.[13]
Tsitsipas S.[6]
1-66-36-4
R16
Musetti L.[13]
Berrettini M.
6-36-3
Alcaraz C.[2]
Altmaier D.
6-36-1
Fils A.[12]
Rublev A.[7]
6-26-3
Tsitsipas S.[6]
Borges N.
6-16-1
Davidovich Fokina A.
Draper J.[5]
6-36-766-4
Popyrin A.
Ruud C.[4]
6-43-67-5
Dimitrov G.[15]
Tabilo A.
6-33-66-2
De Minaur A.[8]
Medvedev D.[9]
6-26-2
R32
Borges N.
Martinez P.
7-56-746-4
Altmaier D.
Gasquet R.
7-55-76-2
Popyrin A.
Tiafoe F.[14]
3-66-36-3
Alcaraz C.[2]
Cerundolo F.
3-66-06-1
Tsitsipas S.[6]
Thompson J.
4-66-46-2
De Minaur A.[8]
Machac T.
3-66-06-3
Musetti L.[13]
Lehecka J.
1-67-56-2
Tabilo A.
Djokovic N.[3]
6-36-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Etcheverry T.
7-626-3
Ruud C.[4]
Bautista Agut R.
6-26-1
Fils A.[12]
Cobolli F.
6-26-4
Dimitrov G.[15]
Vacherot V.
4-66-36-1
Medvedev D.[9]
Muller A.
7-665-76-2
Berrettini M.
Zverev A.[1]
2-66-37-5
Rublev A.[7]
Monfils G.
6-47-62
Draper J.[5]
Giron M.
6-16-1
R64
Vacherot V.
Struff J.
6-26-1
Borges N.
Rune H.[10]
6-23-0
Medvedev D.[9]
Khachanov K.
7-54-66-4
Cobolli F.
Lajovic D.
6-46-2
Cerundolo F.
Fognini F.
6-06-3
Giron M.
Shapovalov D.
6-37-65
Musetti L.[13]
Yunchaokete B.
4-67-56-3
Lehecka J.
Korda S.
6-37-67
Berrettini M.
Navone M.
6-46-4
Thompson J.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-46-3
Martinez P.
Sonego L.
6-41-66-2
Tabilo A.
Wawrinka S.
1-67-57-5
Dimitrov G.[15]
Jarry N.
6-36-4
Muller A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-4
Machac T.
Baez S.
3-66-36-2
Etcheverry T.
Moutet C.
4-66-16-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Shelton B.[11]
6-726-26-1
Tiafoe F.[14]
Kecmanovic M.
6-25-77-65
Popyrin A.
Humbert U.
3-67-626-4
Bautista Agut R.
Nakashima B.
6-26-4
Monfils G.
Marozsan F.
4-66-16-1
Fils A.[12]
Griekspoor T.
6-736-46-2
Altmaier D.
Auger Aliassime F.[16]
7-656-3
Gasquet R.
Arnaldi M.
6-34-66-4