Coco Gauff vs Paula BadosaBeijing Semi-final

Beijing · WTA · Semi-final
#4WTA
2071ELO
2035Hard ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Wednesday, 25 September 2024
hard
#115WTA
1780ELO
1748Hard ELO
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLLWWL
Gauff C.
4-6 6-4 6-2
Badosa P.
Gauff C.
4662
Badosa P.
6421

Coco Gauff defeated Paula Badosa 4-6 6-4 6-2 in the Beijing semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Coco Gauff came in ranked #4, defending last year's semi-final. Coco Gauff narrowed the head-to-head to 5–3.

Key context

Head to head

25
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-06-17BerlinR16grassPaula Badosa1-6 6-3 6-2
2025-01-13Australian OpenQFhardPaula Badosa7-5 6-4
2024-05-06RomeR16clayCoco Gauff5-7 6-4 6-1
2023-04-24MadridR32clayPaula Badosa6-3 6-0
2022-08-01San JoseQFhardPaula Badosa7-6(4) 6-2
2022-02-21DohaR16hardCoco Gauff6-2 6-3
2021-10-06Indian WellsR32hardPaula Badosa6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Gauff C.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Badosa P.

Badosa P.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Serve advantage — Gauff C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gauff C.Badosa P.
25
Serve
21
100
Return
19

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
45%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
48%
44%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.2
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
6.4
5.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (151 vs 104). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
99
93
Break points saved·Even
96
95
Break points won·Slight edge
100
94
Deciding sets·Slight edge
100
95
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 44 days (−0.7)
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 44 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
8.7+287 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Hard Elo 1748
8.9Overall Elo 2071
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1780
3.3
H2H
6.7
5.6
Surface form
8.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Even
65
63

Gauff C.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d) · Badosa P.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 98 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
24°CClear
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 45%

Draw

Semi-finals
Muchova K.
Zheng Q.[5]
6-36-4
Gauff C.[4]
Badosa P.[15]
4-66-46-2