Coco Gauff vs Paula Badosa — Doha Round of 16

Doha · WTA · Round of 16
Coco Gauff
USA14
Coco Gauff
#7WTA
2071ELO
2035Hard ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 February 2022
hard
Paula Badosa
ESP3
Paula Badosa
#141WTA
1780ELO
1748Hard ELO
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLLWWL
Gauff C.
6-2 6-3
Badosa P.
Gauff C.
662
Badosa P.
230

Coco Gauff defeated Paula Badosa 6-2 6-3 in the Doha round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Coco Gauff came in ranked #7. Coco Gauff narrowed the head-to-head to 5–3.

Key context

Head to head

2–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-06-17BerlinR16grassPaula Badosa1-6 6-3 6-2
2025-01-13Australian OpenQFhardPaula Badosa7-5 6-4
2024-09-25BeijingSFhardCoco Gauff4-6 6-4 6-2
2024-05-06RomeR16clayCoco Gauff5-7 6-4 6-1
2023-04-24MadridR32clayPaula Badosa6-3 6-0
2022-08-01San JoseQFhardPaula Badosa7-6(4) 6-2
2021-10-06Indian WellsR32hardPaula Badosa6-2 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Gauff C.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Badosa P.

Badosa P.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Serve advantage — Gauff C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gauff C.Badosa P.
25
Serve
21
100
Return
19

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gauff C.Badosa P.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
48%
44%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
4.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
5.8
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 183). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gauff C.Badosa P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
99
93
Break points saved·Even
96
95
Break points won·Slight edge
100
94
Deciding sets·Slight edge
100
95
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gauff C.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Badosa P.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.7+287 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Hard Elo 1748
8.9Overall Elo 2071
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1780
0.0
H2H
10.0
4.7
Surface form
7.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.5
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gauff C.Badosa P.
Freshness·Even
60
58

Gauff C.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d) · Badosa P.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 98 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
24°CClear
Wind 34 km/hHumidity 28%

Draw

Final
Swiatek I.[7]
Kontaveit A.[4]
6-26-0
Semi-finals
Swiatek I.[7]
Sakkari M.[6]
6-46-3
Kontaveit A.[4]
Ostapenko J.[15]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Swiatek I.[7]
Sabalenka A.[1]
6-26-3
Sakkari M.[6]
Gauff C.[14]
6-36-3
Ostapenko J.[15]
Muguruza G.[5]
6-26-2
Kontaveit A.[4]
Jabeur O.[8]
6-46-1
R16
Sabalenka A.[1]
Teichmann J.
6-26-1
Swiatek I.[7]
Kasatkina D.
6-36-0
Gauff C.[14]
Badosa P.[3]
6-26-3
Kontaveit A.[4]
Mertens E.[16]
6-30-66-2
Ostapenko J.[15]
Krejcikova B.[2]
6-36-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Martincova T.
6-13-66-3
Muguruza G.[5]
Brengle M.
6-06-2
Sakkari M.[6]
Pegula J.[9]
6-47-5
R32
Sabalenka A.[1]
Cornet A.
6-26-2
Mertens E.[16]
Kvitova P.
7-51-2
Brengle M.
Azarenka V.[12]
W/O
Swiatek I.[7]
Golubic V.
6-23-66-2
Gauff C.[14]
Garcia C.
6-27-63
Pegula J.[9]
Juvan K.
6-36-3
Sakkari M.[6]
Li A.
6-36-3
Jabeur O.[8]
Sasnovich A.
1-67-56-3
Muguruza G.[5]
Cirstea S.
7-646-1
Ostapenko J.[15]
Anisimova A.
6-34-66-4
Kasatkina D.
Cristian J.
2-62-2
Kontaveit A.[4]
Konjuh A.
6-26-3
Badosa P.[3]
Tauson C.
6-16-2
Martincova T.
Rus A.
6-26-4
Krejcikova B.[2]
Linette M.
6-16-3
Teichmann J.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-697-5
R64
Van Uytvanck A.
Zvonareva V.
6-46-4
Teichmann J.
Kerber A.[13]
4-66-36-2
Cristian J.
Rybakina E.[11]
6-46-3
Kasatkina D.
Tomljanovic A.
6-46-746-2
Golubic V.
Petkovic A.
6-46-4
Pegula J.[9]
Siniakova K.
6-36-2
Rus A.
Kudermetova V.
7-656-4
Martincova T.
Svitolina E.[10]
6-727-57-65
Mertens E.[16]
Paolini J.
6-32-67-5
Kvitova P.
Begu I.
6-36-1
Konjuh A.
Kostyuk M.
4-67-56-3
Brengle M.
Oz I.
7-56-3
Azarenka V.[12]
Putintseva Y.
5-76-27-5
Ostapenko J.[15]
Dodin O.
6-46-2
Anisimova A.
Haddad Maia B.
7-56-4
Linette M.
Riske Amritraj A.
2-67-656-1
Tauson C.
Bencic B.
6-43-66-3
Cirstea S.
Sherif M.
6-26-1
Garcia C.
Halep S.
6-46-3
Li A.
Kenin S.
6-36-756-3
Juvan K.
Voegele S.
6-46-2
Cornet A.
Samsonova L.
3-66-47-5
Sasnovich A.
Zhang S.
6-16-1
Gauff C.[14]
Rogers S.
6-26-3