Yan Bai vs Blake Mott — Zhangjiagang CH Round of 32

Zhangjiagang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CHN
Yan Bai
#1489ATP
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2024
hard
AUS
Blake Mott
#1565ATP
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Bai Y.
6-4 1-6 6-3
Mott B.
Bai Y.
6162
Mott B.
4631

Yan Bai defeated Blake Mott 6-4 1-6 6-3 in the Zhangjiagang CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Yan Bai closed it out in three sets, 6–4 1–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bai Y.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mott B.

Mott B.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Bai Y.

Serve advantage — Bai Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bai Y.Mott B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
41%
Service points won·Even
60%
56%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
52%
49%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
5.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (34 vs 23). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bai Y.Mott B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
18
1
Break points saved·Slight edge
23
16
Break points won·Slight edge
17
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
73
25
Tiebreaks·
17
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bai Y.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mott B.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Lajal M.[7]
6-746-26-2
Semi-finals
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Hong S.[2]
6-36-764-0
Lajal M.[7]
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Gombos N.
Svrcina D.
W/O
Hong S.[2]
Sun F.
5-76-26-2
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Wu T.
6-756-36-4
Lajal M.[7]
Noguchi R.
6-46-2
R16
Lajal M.[7]
Peniston R.
6-26-2
Gombos N.
Wong C.[1]
6-27-63
Hong S.[2]
Bai Y.
6-26-1
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Ursu V.
6-26-1
Wu T.
Zhukayev B.[6]
5-76-27-5
Noguchi R.
Cui J.
0-66-36-1
Sun F.
Tang S.
6-46-4
Svrcina D.
Takahashi Y.
6-26-1
R32
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Shimizu Y.
6-21-0
Lajal M.[7]
Henning P.
4-67-57-65
Noguchi R.
Haliak M.
6-36-3
Bai Y.
Mott B.
6-41-66-3
Wu T.
Zhou Y.
6-26-1
Wong C.[1]
Agafonov E.
6-35-76-4
Hong S.[2]
Donskoy E.
4-67-616-2
Cui J.
Hsu Y.[3]
6-46-4
Takahashi Y.
Polmans M.[5]
7-56-3
Zhukayev B.[6]
Pokorny L.
7-57-5
Tang S.
Gerasimov E.[8]
7-656-3
Gombos N.
Wu Y.
7-55-76-1
Peniston R.
Van Wyk K.
6-46-4
Sun F.
Uchida K.
6-36-756-0
Svrcina D.
Lamasine T.
6-27-62
Ursu V.
Rai A.
6-27-5