Mark Lajal vs Philip Henning — Zhangjiagang CH Round of 32

Zhangjiagang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
EST7
Mark Lajal
#159ATP
1589ELO
1556Hard ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2024
hard
RSA
Philip Henning
#281ATP
1461ELO
1485Hard ELO
25 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWWWWW
Lajal M.
4-6 7-5 7-6
Henning P.
Lajal M.
47772
Henning P.
65651

Mark Lajal defeated Philip Henning 4-6 7-5 7-6 in the Zhangjiagang CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lajal M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Henning P.

Henning P.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lajal M.Henning P.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.9
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (159 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lajal M.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Henning P.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.2+72 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Hard Elo 1485
7.4Overall Elo 1589
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1461
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
7.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
6.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lajal M.Henning P.
Freshness·Even
88
91

Lajal M.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d) · Henning P.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 31 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Lajal M.[7]
6-746-26-2
Semi-finals
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Hong S.[2]
6-36-764-0
Lajal M.[7]
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Gombos N.
Svrcina D.
W/O
Hong S.[2]
Sun F.
5-76-26-2
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Wu T.
6-756-36-4
Lajal M.[7]
Noguchi R.
6-46-2
R16
Lajal M.[7]
Peniston R.
6-26-2
Gombos N.
Wong C.[1]
6-27-63
Hong S.[2]
Bai Y.
6-26-1
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Ursu V.
6-26-1
Wu T.
Zhukayev B.[6]
5-76-27-5
Noguchi R.
Cui J.
0-66-36-1
Sun F.
Tang S.
6-46-4
Svrcina D.
Takahashi Y.
6-26-1
R32
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Shimizu Y.
6-21-0
Lajal M.[7]
Henning P.
4-67-57-65
Noguchi R.
Haliak M.
6-36-3
Bai Y.
Mott B.
6-41-66-3
Wu T.
Zhou Y.
6-26-1
Wong C.[1]
Agafonov E.
6-35-76-4
Hong S.[2]
Donskoy E.
4-67-616-2
Cui J.
Hsu Y.[3]
6-46-4
Takahashi Y.
Polmans M.[5]
7-56-3
Zhukayev B.[6]
Pokorny L.
7-57-5
Tang S.
Gerasimov E.[8]
7-656-3
Gombos N.
Wu Y.
7-55-76-1
Peniston R.
Van Wyk K.
6-46-4
Sun F.
Uchida K.
6-36-756-0
Svrcina D.
Lamasine T.
6-27-62
Ursu V.
Rai A.
6-27-5