Norbert Gombos vs Coleman Wong — Zhangjiagang CH Round of 16

Zhangjiagang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Norbert Gombos
SVK
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1452Hard ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2024
hard
HKG1
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLLW
Gombos N.
6-2 7-6
Wong C.
Gombos N.
6772
Wong C.
2630

Norbert Gombos defeated Coleman Wong 6-2 7-6 in the Zhangjiagang CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Coleman Wong came in ranked #111.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gombos N.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Wong C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gombos N.Wong C.
—
Serve
37
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gombos N.Wong C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.8
8.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (125 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gombos N.Wong C.
Clutch Rating·Even
41
43
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
91
Break points won·Even
8
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
43
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gombos N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Wong C.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.6Hard Elo 1452
Surface ELO
7.4+141 Hard Elo edge
2.4Overall Elo 1472
ELO gap
7.6Overall Elo 1602
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
6.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
8.9
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gombos N.Wong C.
Freshness·Dominant
74
100

Gombos N.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 54 games (7d) · Wong C.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Lajal M.[7]
6-746-26-2
Semi-finals
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Hong S.[2]
6-36-764-0
Lajal M.[7]
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Gombos N.
Svrcina D.
W/O
Hong S.[2]
Sun F.
5-76-26-2
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Wu T.
6-756-36-4
Lajal M.[7]
Noguchi R.
6-46-2
R16
Lajal M.[7]
Peniston R.
6-26-2
Gombos N.
Wong C.[1]
6-27-63
Hong S.[2]
Bai Y.
6-26-1
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Ursu V.
6-26-1
Wu T.
Zhukayev B.[6]
5-76-27-5
Noguchi R.
Cui J.
0-66-36-1
Sun F.
Tang S.
6-46-4
Svrcina D.
Takahashi Y.
6-26-1
R32
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Shimizu Y.
6-21-0
Lajal M.[7]
Henning P.
4-67-57-65
Noguchi R.
Haliak M.
6-36-3
Bai Y.
Mott B.
6-41-66-3
Wu T.
Zhou Y.
6-26-1
Wong C.[1]
Agafonov E.
6-35-76-4
Hong S.[2]
Donskoy E.
4-67-616-2
Cui J.
Hsu Y.[3]
6-46-4
Takahashi Y.
Polmans M.[5]
7-56-3
Zhukayev B.[6]
Pokorny L.
7-57-5
Tang S.
Gerasimov E.[8]
7-656-3
Gombos N.
Wu Y.
7-55-76-1
Peniston R.
Van Wyk K.
6-46-4
Sun F.
Uchida K.
6-36-756-0
Svrcina D.
Lamasine T.
6-27-62
Ursu V.
Rai A.
6-27-5