Henri Squire vs Jan Choinski — Luedenscheid CH Round of 32

Luedenscheid CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER7
Henri Squire
#215ATP
1511ELO
1490Clay ELO
25 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
clay
Jan Choinski
GBR
Jan Choinski
#75ATP
1686ELO
1652Clay ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
Squire H.
6-2 6-2
Choinski J.
Squire H.
662
Choinski J.
220

Henri Squire defeated Jan Choinski 6-2 6-2 in the Luedenscheid CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jan Choinski came in ranked #75, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Squire H.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Choinski J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Squire H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Squire H.Choinski J.
1st serve in·Even
65%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.7
4.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (165 vs 164). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Squire H.Choinski J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
40
55
Break points saved·Even
87
90
Break points won·Slight edge
12
20
Deciding sets·Clear edge
65
88
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
33
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Squire H.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Choinski J.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.7Clay Elo 1490
Surface ELO
6.3+162 Clay Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1511
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1686
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.4
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.4
7.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Squire H.Choinski J.
Freshness·Slight edge
58
49

Squire H.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 105 games (7d) · Choinski J.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 113 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Collignon R.
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
3-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Droguet T.[4]
3-1
Collignon R.
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Squire H.[7]
3-67-57-5
Droguet T.[4]
Roca Batalla O.[5]
6-36-2
Majchrzak K.[8]
Burruchaga R.[3]
6-16-3
Collignon R.
Tabur C.
6-44-66-4
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Campana Lee G.
6-13-66-4
Burruchaga R.[3]
Buse I.
7-56-3
Roca Batalla O.[5]
Onclin G.
7-625-76-4
Squire H.[7]
Topo M.
3-66-37-5
Droguet T.[4]
Landaluce M.
7-57-63
Majchrzak K.[8]
Hemery C.
6-16-3
Tabur C.
Travaglia S.
5-76-26-1
Collignon R.
Trungelliti M.[2]
6-46-4
R32
Burruchaga R.[3]
Alcala Gurri M.
6-06-756-1
Campana Lee G.
Barranco Cosano J.
7-657-65
Majchrzak K.[8]
Mena F.
7-657-66
Hemery C.
Agamenone F.
6-40-0
Roca Batalla O.[5]
Zanellato N.
6-36-2
Collignon R.
Dedura Palomero D.
6-46-4
Trungelliti M.[2]
Engel J.
2-66-47-66
Topo M.
Pieczkowski O.
6-36-4
Travaglia S.
Rodionov J.[6]
4-66-46-0
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Molleker R.
6-36-4
Squire H.[7]
Choinski J.
6-26-2
Droguet T.[4]
Vankan M.
7-646-2
Landaluce M.
Basic M.
6-46-2
Onclin G.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-17-5
Buse I.
Lamasine T.
6-36-3
Tabur C.
Schoenhaus M.
6-756-06-4