Ignacio Buse vs Tristan Lamasine — Luedenscheid CH Round of 32

Luedenscheid CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ignacio Buse
PER
Ignacio Buse
#33ATP
1822ELO
1786Clay ELO
$949kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
clay
FRA
Tristan Lamasine
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLWWLL
Buse I.
6-3 6-3
Lamasine T.
Buse I.
662
Lamasine T.
330

Ignacio Buse defeated Tristan Lamasine 6-3 6-3 in the Luedenscheid CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Buse I.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Lamasine T.

Lamasine T.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Buse I.

Serve advantage — Buse I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Buse I.Lamasine T.
41
Serve
—
14
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Buse I.Lamasine T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
54%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (144 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Buse I.Lamasine T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
63
21
Break points saved·Dominant
87
38
Break points won·Slight edge
28
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
51
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Buse I.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lamasine T.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
2.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Buse I.Lamasine T.
Freshness·
98
—

Buse I.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Collignon R.
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
3-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Droguet T.[4]
3-1
Collignon R.
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Squire H.[7]
3-67-57-5
Droguet T.[4]
Roca Batalla O.[5]
6-36-2
Majchrzak K.[8]
Burruchaga R.[3]
6-16-3
Collignon R.
Tabur C.
6-44-66-4
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Campana Lee G.
6-13-66-4
Burruchaga R.[3]
Buse I.
7-56-3
Roca Batalla O.[5]
Onclin G.
7-625-76-4
Squire H.[7]
Topo M.
3-66-37-5
Droguet T.[4]
Landaluce M.
7-57-63
Majchrzak K.[8]
Hemery C.
6-16-3
Tabur C.
Travaglia S.
5-76-26-1
Collignon R.
Trungelliti M.[2]
6-46-4
R32
Burruchaga R.[3]
Alcala Gurri M.
6-06-756-1
Campana Lee G.
Barranco Cosano J.
7-657-65
Majchrzak K.[8]
Mena F.
7-657-66
Hemery C.
Agamenone F.
6-40-0
Roca Batalla O.[5]
Zanellato N.
6-36-2
Collignon R.
Dedura Palomero D.
6-46-4
Trungelliti M.[2]
Engel J.
2-66-47-66
Topo M.
Pieczkowski O.
6-36-4
Travaglia S.
Rodionov J.[6]
4-66-46-0
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Molleker R.
6-36-4
Squire H.[7]
Choinski J.
6-26-2
Droguet T.[4]
Vankan M.
7-646-2
Landaluce M.
Basic M.
6-46-2
Onclin G.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-17-5
Buse I.
Lamasine T.
6-36-3
Tabur C.
Schoenhaus M.
6-756-06-4