Clement Tabur vs Max Schoenhaus — Luedenscheid CH Round of 32

Luedenscheid CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
clay
GER
Max Schoenhaus
#320ATP
1508ELO
1467Clay ELO
18 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWLWLW
Tabur C.
6-7 6-0 6-4
Schoenhaus M.
Tabur C.
65662
Schoenhaus M.
77041

Clement Tabur defeated Max Schoenhaus 6-7 6-0 6-4 in the Luedenscheid CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Schoenhaus M.

Schoenhaus M.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Serve advantage — Tabur C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Schoenhaus M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.5
6.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.8
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 19). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Schoenhaus M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Schoenhaus M.
Freshness·Clear edge
55
78

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d) · Schoenhaus M.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 59 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Collignon R.
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
3-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Droguet T.[4]
3-1
Collignon R.
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Squire H.[7]
3-67-57-5
Droguet T.[4]
Roca Batalla O.[5]
6-36-2
Majchrzak K.[8]
Burruchaga R.[3]
6-16-3
Collignon R.
Tabur C.
6-44-66-4
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Campana Lee G.
6-13-66-4
Burruchaga R.[3]
Buse I.
7-56-3
Roca Batalla O.[5]
Onclin G.
7-625-76-4
Squire H.[7]
Topo M.
3-66-37-5
Droguet T.[4]
Landaluce M.
7-57-63
Majchrzak K.[8]
Hemery C.
6-16-3
Tabur C.
Travaglia S.
5-76-26-1
Collignon R.
Trungelliti M.[2]
6-46-4
R32
Burruchaga R.[3]
Alcala Gurri M.
6-06-756-1
Campana Lee G.
Barranco Cosano J.
7-657-65
Majchrzak K.[8]
Mena F.
7-657-66
Hemery C.
Agamenone F.
6-40-0
Roca Batalla O.[5]
Zanellato N.
6-36-2
Collignon R.
Dedura Palomero D.
6-46-4
Trungelliti M.[2]
Engel J.
2-66-47-66
Topo M.
Pieczkowski O.
6-36-4
Travaglia S.
Rodionov J.[6]
4-66-46-0
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
Molleker R.
6-36-4
Squire H.[7]
Choinski J.
6-26-2
Droguet T.[4]
Vankan M.
7-646-2
Landaluce M.
Basic M.
6-46-2
Onclin G.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-17-5
Buse I.
Lamasine T.
6-36-3
Tabur C.
Schoenhaus M.
6-756-06-4