Andrey Rublev vs Taylor Fritz — Monte Carlo Masters Semi-final

Monte Carlo Masters · ATP · Semi-final
Andrey Rublev
RUS5
Andrey Rublev
#13ATP
1902ELO
1872Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
Taylor Fritz
USA8
Taylor Fritz
#7ATP
1909ELO
1761Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$31MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
Rublev A.
5-7 6-1 6-3
Fritz T.
Rublev A.
5662
Fritz T.
7131

Andrey Rublev defeated Taylor Fritz 5-7 6-1 6-3 in the Monte Carlo Masters semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Taylor Fritz came in ranked #7, leading the head-to-head 5–3, defending last year's quarter-final. Andrey Rublev narrowed the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

Head to head

3–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-07-27Canada MastersQFhardTaylor Fritz6-3 7-6(4)
2024-04-22Madrid MastersSFclayAndrey Rublev6-4 6-3
2022-08-15Cincinnati MastersR16hardTaylor Fritz6-7(4) 6-2 7-5
2022-03-07Indian Wells MastersSFhardTaylor Fritz7-5 6-4
2021-11-01Paris MastersR32hardTaylor Fritz7-5 7-6(2)
2021-03-15DubaiR16hardAndrey Rublev6-3 6-1
2018-11-05NextGen FinalsRRhardAndrey Rublev4-2 1-4 3-4(4) 4-3(2) 4-2
2018-03-05Indian Wells MastersR64hardTaylor Fritz6-4 7-6(4)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Fritz T.

Fritz T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Rublev A.Fritz T.
14
Serve
—
62
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Fritz T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
55%
Service points won·Even
67%
70%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
66%
69%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.9
11.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Fritz T.
Clutch Rating·Even
88
87
Break points saved·Even
100
100
Break points won·Clear edge
72
60
Deciding sets·Even
97
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
92
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rublev A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Fritz T.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.7+112 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.3Clay Elo 1761
3.8Overall Elo 1902
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1909
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
6.3
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Fritz T.
Freshness·Dominant
94
67

Rublev A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Fritz T.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
16°COvercast
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 62%
Final
Rublev A.[5]
Rune H.[6]
5-76-27-5
Semi-finals
Rune H.[6]
Sinner J.[7]
1-67-57-5
Rublev A.[5]
Fritz T.[8]
5-76-16-3
Quarter-finals
Rublev A.[5]
Struff J.
6-17-65
Sinner J.[7]
Musetti L.[16]
6-26-2
Rune H.[6]
Medvedev D.[3]
6-36-4
Fritz T.[8]
Tsitsipas S.[2]
6-26-4
R16
Musetti L.[16]
Djokovic N.[1]
4-67-56-4
Sinner J.[7]
Hurkacz H.[10]
3-67-666-1
Rune H.[6]
Berrettini M.
W/O
Struff J.
Ruud C.[4]
6-17-66
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Jarry N.
6-36-4
Medvedev D.[3]
Zverev A.[13]
3-67-57-67
Fritz T.[8]
Lehecka J.
4-66-46-1
Rublev A.[5]
Khachanov K.[9]
7-646-2
R32
Djokovic N.[1]
Gakhov I.
7-656-2
Sinner J.[7]
Schwartzman D.
6-03-1
Hurkacz H.[10]
Draper J.
6-36-737-5
Medvedev D.[3]
Sonego L.
6-36-2
Rune H.[6]
Thiem D.
6-26-4
Rublev A.[5]
Munar J.
4-66-26-2
Khachanov K.[9]
Ivashka I.
7-626-2
Struff J.
De Minaur A.[14]
6-36-2
Ruud C.[4]
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-57-61
Fritz T.[8]
Wawrinka S.
7-6106-2
Lehecka J.
Dimitrov G.
7-646-4
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Bonzi B.
4-1
Zverev A.[13]
Bautista Agut R.
6-46-4
Berrettini M.
Cerundolo F.
5-77-616-4
Jarry N.
Popyrin A.
3-67-56-4
Musetti L.[16]
Nardi L.
6-06-0
R64
Gakhov I.
Mcdonald M.
7-662-66-3
Nardi L.
Vacherot V.
7-57-5
Musetti L.[16]
Kecmanovic M.
7-616-0
Hurkacz H.[10]
Djere L.
6-757-657-65
Draper J.
Baez S.
6-37-5
Bautista Agut R.
Krajinovic F.
5-77-6106-1
Zverev A.[13]
Bublik A.
3-66-26-4
Munar J.
Huesler M.
7-634-66-4
Khachanov K.[9]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-26-2
De Minaur A.[14]
Murray A.
6-16-3
Struff J.
Ramos A.
6-46-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Fucsovics M.
3-67-626-1
Dimitrov G.
Shelton B.
6-13-66-3
Jarry N.
Coric B.[15]
6-26-3
Popyrin A.
Lajovic D.
7-616-3
Bonzi B.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-17-5
Sonego L.
Humbert U.
3-67-57-5
Lehecka J.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-17-5
Schwartzman D.
Goffin D.
6-46-2
Ivashka I.
Evans D.
2-66-26-3
Cerundolo F.
Norrie C.[11]
6-36-4
Berrettini M.
Cressy M.
6-46-2
Thiem D.
Gasquet R.
6-16-4
Wawrinka S.
Griekspoor T.
5-76-36-4