Taylor Fritz vs Andrey Rublev — Cincinnati Masters Round of 16

Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Round of 16
Taylor Fritz
USA11
Taylor Fritz
#10ATP
1909ELO
1839Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$31MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 August 2022
hard
Andrey Rublev
RUS6
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Fritz T.
6-7 6-2 7-5
Rublev A.
Fritz T.
64672
Rublev A.
77251

Taylor Fritz defeated Andrey Rublev 6-7 6-2 7-5 in the Cincinnati Masters round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Taylor Fritz came in ranked #10, defending last year's round of 64. Taylor Fritz extended the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

Head to head

4–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-07-27Canada MastersQFhardTaylor Fritz6-3 7-6(4)
2024-04-22Madrid MastersSFclayAndrey Rublev6-4 6-3
2023-04-10Monte Carlo MastersSFclayAndrey Rublev5-7 6-1 6-3
2022-03-07Indian Wells MastersSFhardTaylor Fritz7-5 6-4
2021-11-01Paris MastersR32hardTaylor Fritz7-5 7-6(2)
2021-03-15DubaiR16hardAndrey Rublev6-3 6-1
2018-11-05NextGen FinalsRRhardAndrey Rublev4-2 1-4 3-4(4) 4-3(2) 4-2
2018-03-05Indian Wells MastersR64hardTaylor Fritz6-4 7-6(4)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Fritz T.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Rublev A.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Fritz T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fritz T.Rublev A.
76
Serve
55
32
Return
52

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Fritz T.Rublev A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
79%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
52%
Service points won·Even
70%
67%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
69%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.5
7.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fritz T.Rublev A.
Clutch Rating·Even
87
89
Break points saved·Even
100
100
Break points won·Clear edge
60
72
Deciding sets·Even
98
97
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fritz T.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Rublev A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0Hard Elo 1839
Surface ELO
4.0+10 Hard Elo edge
6.2Overall Elo 1909
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1902
7.2
H2H
2.8
6.9
Surface form
6.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.2
Minutes 14d
5.7
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
7.3
Country comfort
5.7
Context
6.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fritz T.Rublev A.
Freshness·Clear edge
72
95

Fritz T.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 61 games (7d) · Rublev A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
23°CMainly clear
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 70%
Final
Coric B.
Tsitsipas S.[4]
7-606-2
Semi-finals
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Medvedev D.[1]
7-663-66-3
Coric B.
Norrie C.[9]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Medvedev D.[1]
Fritz T.[11]
7-616-3
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Isner J.
7-655-76-3
Coric B.
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
6-46-4
Norrie C.[9]
Alcaraz C.[3]
7-646-746-4
R16
Medvedev D.[1]
Shapovalov D.
7-57-5
Fritz T.[11]
Rublev A.[6]
6-746-27-5
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Schwartzman D.[13]
6-36-3
Isner J.
Korda S.
7-631-67-64
Norrie C.[9]
Shelton B.
6-06-2
Alcaraz C.[3]
Cilic M.[14]
7-646-1
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
Sinner J.[10]
2-67-616-1
Coric B.
Bautista Agut R.[15]
6-26-3
R32
Medvedev D.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-47-5
Shapovalov D.
Paul T.
3-66-46-3
Rublev A.[6]
Fognini F.
6-777-636-2
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Krajinovic F.
6-36-4
Korda S.
Tiafoe F.
4-66-16-4
Isner J.
Hurkacz H.[8]
7-656-756-2
Shelton B.
Ruud C.[5]
6-36-3
Norrie C.[9]
Murray A.
3-66-36-4
Cilic M.[14]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-757-5
Alcaraz C.[3]
Mcdonald M.
6-36-2
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
De Minaur A.
6-36-2
Bautista Agut R.[15]
Giron M.
6-36-3
Sinner J.[10]
Kecmanovic M.
7-53-1
Coric B.
Nadal R.[2]
7-694-66-3
Fritz T.[11]
Kyrgios N.
6-36-2
Schwartzman D.[13]
Karatsev A.
7-633-66-2
R64
Murray A.
Wawrinka S.
7-635-77-5
Kyrgios N.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-56-4
Tiafoe F.
Berrettini M.[12]
7-634-67-65
Korda S.
Khachanov K.
6-36-4
Isner J.
Bonzi B.
7-6113-67-64
Shelton B.
Sonego L.
7-653-67-5
Norrie C.[9]
Rune H.
7-654-66-4
Cilic M.[14]
Munar J.
6-36-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Wolf J.
7-626-2
Mcdonald M.
Basilashvili N.
6-06-1
De Minaur A.
Laaksonen H.
6-26-2
Kecmanovic M.
Carreno Busta P.
1-67-57-64
Sinner J.[10]
Kokkinakis T.
6-796-47-66
Bautista Agut R.[15]
Cerundolo F.
6-756-46-2
Giron M.
Goffin D.
6-36-4
Coric B.
Musetti L.
7-626-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Cressy M.
6-24-66-4
Shapovalov D.
Dimitrov G.[16]
7-646-3
Fritz T.[11]
Baez S.
6-16-1
Fognini F.
Ramos A.
6-26-3
Krajinovic F.
Evans D.
6-36-4
Karatsev A.
Nakashima B.
7-57-5
Schwartzman D.[13]
Molcan A.
5-76-46-2
Paul T.
Brooksby J.
6-36-2