Felix Auger Aliassime vs Alex De Minaur — Cincinnati Masters Round of 32

Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Round of 32
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN7
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1932Hard ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 August 2022
hard
Alex De Minaur
AUS
Alex De Minaur
#6ATP
1961ELO
1935Hard ELO
$2.4MYTD
$25MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
Auger Aliassime F.
6-3 6-2
De Minaur A.
Auger Aliassime F.
662
De Minaur A.
320

Felix Auger Aliassime defeated Alex De Minaur 6-3 6-2 in the Cincinnati Masters round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Felix Auger Aliassime came in ranked #4, defending last year's quarter-final. Felix Auger Aliassime extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-09RotterdamFhardAlex De Minaur6-3 6-2
2025-08-25US OpenQFhardFelix Auger Aliassime4-6 7-6(7) 7-5 7-6(4)
2024-05-06Rome MastersR32clayAlex De Minaur6-7(2) 6-4 6-4
2022-11-27Davis Cup Finals F: CAN vs AUSRRhardFelix Auger Aliassime6-3 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Auger Aliassime F.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs De Minaur A.

De Minaur A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Auger Aliassime F.De Minaur A.
74
Serve
48
44
Return
80

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Auger Aliassime F.De Minaur A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
55%
Service points won·Even
68%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
41%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.4
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Auger Aliassime F.De Minaur A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
84
95
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Dominant
50
97
Deciding sets·Even
99
97
Tiebreaks·Even
99
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Auger Aliassime F.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
De Minaur A.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0Hard Elo 1932
Surface ELO
5.0+3 Hard Elo edge
5.0Overall Elo 1958
ELO gap
5.0Overall Elo 1961
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
7.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.5
Minutes 14d
5.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
5.5
Country comfort
5.3
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Auger Aliassime F.De Minaur A.
Freshness·Clear edge
59
77

Auger Aliassime F.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 112 games (7d) · De Minaur A.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
23°CMainly clear
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 70%
Final
Coric B.
Tsitsipas S.[4]
7-606-2
Semi-finals
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Medvedev D.[1]
7-663-66-3
Coric B.
Norrie C.[9]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Medvedev D.[1]
Fritz T.[11]
7-616-3
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Isner J.
7-655-76-3
Coric B.
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
6-46-4
Norrie C.[9]
Alcaraz C.[3]
7-646-746-4
R16
Medvedev D.[1]
Shapovalov D.
7-57-5
Fritz T.[11]
Rublev A.[6]
6-746-27-5
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Schwartzman D.[13]
6-36-3
Isner J.
Korda S.
7-631-67-64
Norrie C.[9]
Shelton B.
6-06-2
Alcaraz C.[3]
Cilic M.[14]
7-646-1
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
Sinner J.[10]
2-67-616-1
Coric B.
Bautista Agut R.[15]
6-26-3
R32
Medvedev D.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-47-5
Shapovalov D.
Paul T.
3-66-46-3
Rublev A.[6]
Fognini F.
6-777-636-2
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Krajinovic F.
6-36-4
Korda S.
Tiafoe F.
4-66-16-4
Isner J.
Hurkacz H.[8]
7-656-756-2
Shelton B.
Ruud C.[5]
6-36-3
Norrie C.[9]
Murray A.
3-66-36-4
Cilic M.[14]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-757-5
Alcaraz C.[3]
Mcdonald M.
6-36-2
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
De Minaur A.
6-36-2
Bautista Agut R.[15]
Giron M.
6-36-3
Sinner J.[10]
Kecmanovic M.
7-53-1
Coric B.
Nadal R.[2]
7-694-66-3
Fritz T.[11]
Kyrgios N.
6-36-2
Schwartzman D.[13]
Karatsev A.
7-633-66-2
R64
Murray A.
Wawrinka S.
7-635-77-5
Kyrgios N.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-56-4
Tiafoe F.
Berrettini M.[12]
7-634-67-65
Korda S.
Khachanov K.
6-36-4
Isner J.
Bonzi B.
7-6113-67-64
Shelton B.
Sonego L.
7-653-67-5
Norrie C.[9]
Rune H.
7-654-66-4
Cilic M.[14]
Munar J.
6-36-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Wolf J.
7-626-2
Mcdonald M.
Basilashvili N.
6-06-1
De Minaur A.
Laaksonen H.
6-26-2
Kecmanovic M.
Carreno Busta P.
1-67-57-64
Sinner J.[10]
Kokkinakis T.
6-796-47-66
Bautista Agut R.[15]
Cerundolo F.
6-756-46-2
Giron M.
Goffin D.
6-36-4
Coric B.
Musetti L.
7-626-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Cressy M.
6-24-66-4
Shapovalov D.
Dimitrov G.[16]
7-646-3
Fritz T.[11]
Baez S.
6-16-1
Fognini F.
Ramos A.
6-26-3
Krajinovic F.
Evans D.
6-36-4
Karatsev A.
Nakashima B.
7-57-5
Schwartzman D.[13]
Molcan A.
5-76-46-2
Paul T.
Brooksby J.
6-36-2