Casper Ruud vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Rome Masters Round of 32

Rome Masters · ATP · Round of 32
NOR
Casper Ruud
[5]
#16ATP
1973ELO
1970Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
WWLWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1758ELO
1702Clay ELO
$537kYTD
$6.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LLLWLWLWWW

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruud C.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Van De Zandschulp B.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.8+268 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.2Clay Elo 1702
7.1Overall Elo 1973
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1758
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.4
Surface form
6.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
2.2
4.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Ruud C.
64662
Van De Zandschulp B.
77241

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
0.68
SlowFast

Head to head

2–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-04-01EstorilR16clayCasper Ruud6-1 6-2
2023-04-10Monte Carlo MastersR32clayCasper Ruud7-5 7-6(1)
2023-03-20Miami MastersR32hardBotic Van De Zandschulp3-6 6-4 6-4
2022-04-25MunichQFclayBotic Van De Zandschulp7-5 6-1
2021-08-30US OpenR64hardBotic Van De Zandschulp3-6 6-4 6-3 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Statistics

Recent form
Ruud C.Van De Zandschulp B.
68%1st serve in+5%63%
71%1st serve points won+3%74%
57%2nd serve points won+10%47%
66%Service points won+2%64%
35%Return points won+3%38%
71%Break points saved+11%60%
6.9Aces / match+0.16.8
1.8Double faults / match+2.84.6

Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Draw

Final
Djokovic N.[1]
Tsitsipas S.[4]
6-07-65
Semi-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Ruud C.[5]
6-46-3
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Zverev A.[2]
4-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
7-57-61
Ruud C.[5]
Shapovalov D.[13]
7-677-5
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Sinner J.[10]
7-656-2
Zverev A.[2]
Garin C.
7-56-2
R16
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Giron M.
6-36-2
Garin C.
Cilic M.
6-34-66-4
Zverev A.[2]
De Minaur A.
6-37-65
Sinner J.[10]
Krajinovic F.
6-27-66
Djokovic N.[1]
Wawrinka S.
6-26-2
Shapovalov D.[13]
Nadal R.[3]
1-67-56-2
Ruud C.[5]
Brooksby J.
6-36-4
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Khachanov K.
4-66-06-3
R32
Djokovic N.[1]
Karatsev A.
6-36-2
Nadal R.[3]
Isner J.
6-36-1
Shapovalov D.[13]
Basilashvili N.
6-47-65
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Dimitrov G.
6-35-77-64
Wawrinka S.
Djere L.
7-683-66-4
Sinner J.[10]
Fognini F.
6-23-66-3
Krajinovic F.
Rublev A.[6]
6-26-4
Brooksby J.
Goffin D.
6-07-61
De Minaur A.
Paul T.
7-56-4
Ruud C.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-746-26-4
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Davidovich Fokina A.
4-67-626-2
Zverev A.[2]
Baez S.
7-666-3
Garin C.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-4
Cilic M.
Norrie C.[9]
5-76-26-1
Khachanov K.
Carreno Busta P.[15]
6-42-66-1
Giron M.
Schwartzman D.[12]
6-17-64
R64
Wawrinka S.
Opelka R.[14]
3-67-56-2
Giron M.
Bublik A.
3-66-46-3
Shapovalov D.[13]
Sonego L.
7-653-66-3
Goffin D.
Hurkacz H.[11]
7-687-62
Van De Zandschulp B.
Korda S.
6-46-1
Dimitrov G.
Nakashima B.
6-36-4
Norrie C.[9]
Nardi L.
6-46-4
Isner J.
Cerundolo F.
6-46-3
Garin C.
Passaro F.
6-36-2
Brooksby J.
Cobolli F.
6-36-4
Karatsev A.
Harris L.
3-66-37-67
Krajinovic F.
Tiafoe F.
7-677-64
Davidovich Fokina A.
Ivashka I.
6-24-66-4
Fognini F.
Thiem D.
6-47-65
Basilashvili N.
Evans D.
7-626-2
Paul T.
Ramos A.
6-46-4
Cilic M.
Arnaldi M.
6-16-4
Djere L.
Coric B.
6-26-736-2
Khachanov K.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-4
Baez S.
Griekspoor T.
6-36-776-2
Sinner J.[10]
Martinez P.
6-46-3
Schwartzman D.[12]
Kecmanovic M.
6-23-67-63
De Minaur A.
Lajovic D.
6-46-1
Carreno Busta P.[15]
Delbonis F.
6-36-2