Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Casper RuudMunich Quarter-final

Munich · ATP · Quarter-final
#55ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 April 2022
clay
#13ATP
1983ELO
1973Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-5 6-1
Ruud C.
Van De Zandschulp B.
762
Ruud C.
510

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Casper Ruud 7-5 6-1 in the Munich quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #13, leading the head-to-head 3–2, defending last year's semi-final. Botic Van De Zandschulp narrowed the head-to-head to 3–3.

Key context

Head to head

23
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-04-01EstorilR16clayCasper Ruud6-1 6-2
2023-04-10Monte Carlo MastersR32clayCasper Ruud7-5 7-6(1)
2023-03-20Miami MastersR32hardBotic Van De Zandschulp3-6 6-4 6-4
2022-05-09Rome MastersR32clayCasper Ruud6-7(4) 6-2 6-4
2021-08-30US OpenR64hardBotic Van De Zandschulp3-6 6-4 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Ruud C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Serve advantage — Ruud C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Van De Zandschulp B.Ruud C.
33
Serve
54
74
Return
69

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
54%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
5.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
77
91
Break points saved·Even
98
99
Break points won·Slight edge
68
75
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
99
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.2Clay Elo 1690
Surface ELO
7.8+283 Clay Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1743
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1983
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
7.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
4.5
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Slight edge
91
98

Van De Zandschulp B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Ruud C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
12°CDrizzle
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 64%