Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Sebastian Korda — Rome Masters Round of 64

Rome Masters · ATP · Round of 64
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1758ELO
1702Clay ELO
$537kYTD
$6.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LLLWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
USA
Sebastian Korda
#47ATP
1809ELO
1670Clay ELO
$471kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LWWLWWWWWW

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van De Zandschulp B.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Korda S.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.1+33 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.9Clay Elo 1670
3.0Overall Elo 1758
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 1809
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.7
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.2
Minutes 14d
3.6
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Van De Zandschulp B.
662
Korda S.
410

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
0.68
SlowFast

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-26DubaiR16hardSebastian Korda6-1 6-0
2022-04-11Monte Carlo MastersR64claySebastian Korda7-5 6-4
2021-10-25St. PetersburgR16carpetBotic Van De Zandschulp6-2 7-5

Statistics

Recent form
Van De Zandschulp B.Korda S.
63%1st serve in+1%62%
74%1st serve points won+4%78%
47%2nd serve points won+6%53%
64%Service points won+5%69%
38%Return points won+1%39%
60%Break points saved+3%57%
6.8Aces / match+2.59.3
4.6Double faults / match+2.62

Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Draw

Final
Djokovic N.[1]
Tsitsipas S.[4]
6-07-65
Semi-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Ruud C.[5]
6-46-3
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Zverev A.[2]
4-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Djokovic N.[1]
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
7-57-61
Ruud C.[5]
Shapovalov D.[13]
7-677-5
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Sinner J.[10]
7-656-2
Zverev A.[2]
Garin C.
7-56-2
R16
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Giron M.
6-36-2
Garin C.
Cilic M.
6-34-66-4
Zverev A.[2]
De Minaur A.
6-37-65
Sinner J.[10]
Krajinovic F.
6-27-66
Djokovic N.[1]
Wawrinka S.
6-26-2
Shapovalov D.[13]
Nadal R.[3]
1-67-56-2
Ruud C.[5]
Brooksby J.
6-36-4
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Khachanov K.
4-66-06-3
R32
Djokovic N.[1]
Karatsev A.
6-36-2
Nadal R.[3]
Isner J.
6-36-1
Shapovalov D.[13]
Basilashvili N.
6-47-65
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Dimitrov G.
6-35-77-64
Wawrinka S.
Djere L.
7-683-66-4
Sinner J.[10]
Fognini F.
6-23-66-3
Krajinovic F.
Rublev A.[6]
6-26-4
Brooksby J.
Goffin D.
6-07-61
De Minaur A.
Paul T.
7-56-4
Ruud C.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-746-26-4
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Davidovich Fokina A.
4-67-626-2
Zverev A.[2]
Baez S.
7-666-3
Garin C.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-4
Cilic M.
Norrie C.[9]
5-76-26-1
Khachanov K.
Carreno Busta P.[15]
6-42-66-1
Giron M.
Schwartzman D.[12]
6-17-64
R64
Wawrinka S.
Opelka R.[14]
3-67-56-2
Giron M.
Bublik A.
3-66-46-3
Shapovalov D.[13]
Sonego L.
7-653-66-3
Goffin D.
Hurkacz H.[11]
7-687-62
Van De Zandschulp B.
Korda S.
6-46-1
Dimitrov G.
Nakashima B.
6-36-4
Norrie C.[9]
Nardi L.
6-46-4
Isner J.
Cerundolo F.
6-46-3
Garin C.
Passaro F.
6-36-2
Brooksby J.
Cobolli F.
6-36-4
Karatsev A.
Harris L.
3-66-37-67
Krajinovic F.
Tiafoe F.
7-677-64
Davidovich Fokina A.
Ivashka I.
6-24-66-4
Fognini F.
Thiem D.
6-47-65
Basilashvili N.
Evans D.
7-626-2
Paul T.
Ramos A.
6-46-4
Cilic M.
Arnaldi M.
6-16-4
Djere L.
Coric B.
6-26-736-2
Khachanov K.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-4
Baez S.
Griekspoor T.
6-36-776-2
Sinner J.[10]
Martinez P.
6-46-3
Schwartzman D.[12]
Kecmanovic M.
6-23-67-63
De Minaur A.
Lajovic D.
6-46-1
Carreno Busta P.[15]
Delbonis F.
6-36-2