Sebastian Korda vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Monte Carlo Masters Round of 64

Monte Carlo Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Sebastian Korda
USA
Sebastian Korda
#63ATP
1809ELO
1670Clay ELO
$471kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 April 2022
clay
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#54ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Korda S.
7-5 6-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Korda S.
762
Van De Zandschulp B.
540

Sebastian Korda defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 7-5 6-4 in the Monte Carlo Masters round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #54, leading the head-to-head 2–1. Sebastian Korda narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-26DubaiR16hardSebastian Korda6-1 6-0
2022-05-09Rome MastersR64clayBotic Van De Zandschulp6-4 6-1
2021-10-25St. PetersburgR16carpetBotic Van De Zandschulp6-2 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Korda S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Korda S.

Serve advantage — Korda S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Korda S.Van De Zandschulp B.
—
Serve
33
—
Return
74

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Korda S.Van De Zandschulp B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.1
5.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Korda S.Van De Zandschulp B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
87
77
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Slight edge
73
68
Deciding sets·Clear edge
96
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
94
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Korda S.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Van De Zandschulp B.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9Clay Elo 1670
Surface ELO
4.1+20 Clay Elo edge
7.0Overall Elo 1809
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1743
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
7.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.6
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Korda S.Van De Zandschulp B.
Freshness·
—
87

Van De Zandschulp B.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
16°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 40%
Final
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-37-63
Semi-finals
Davidovich Fokina A.
Dimitrov G.
6-46-726-3
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Zverev A.[2]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Davidovich Fokina A.
Fritz T.[10]
2-66-46-3
Dimitrov G.
Hurkacz H.[11]
6-43-67-62
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Schwartzman D.[12]
6-26-736-4
Zverev A.[2]
Sinner J.[9]
5-76-37-65
R16
Schwartzman D.[12]
Musetti L.
2-66-46-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Goffin D.
6-46-1
Fritz T.[10]
Korda S.
7-647-5
Dimitrov G.
Ruud C.[4]
6-37-5
Hurkacz H.[11]
Ramos A.
7-626-2
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Djere L.
7-57-61
Sinner J.[9]
Rublev A.[5]
5-76-16-3
Zverev A.[2]
Carreno Busta P.[13]
6-27-5
R32
Dimitrov G.
Lajovic D.
4-66-36-2
Carreno Busta P.[13]
Bublik A.
4-67-634-3
Fritz T.[10]
Cilic M.
6-34-66-4
Korda S.
Alcaraz C.[8]
7-626-756-3
Ruud C.[4]
Rune H.
7-657-5
Hurkacz H.[11]
Martinez P.
6-34-66-4
Ramos A.
Norrie C.[7]
6-42-66-4
Musetti L.
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
6-27-62
Schwartzman D.[12]
Fucsovics M.
6-07-64
Djere L.
Sonego L.[16]
6-46-4
Davidovich Fokina A.
Djokovic N.[1]
6-36-756-1
Goffin D.
Evans D.
7-656-2
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Fognini F.
6-36-0
Rublev A.[5]
De Minaur A.
2-66-16-4
Sinner J.[9]
Ruusuvuori E.
7-56-3
Zverev A.[2]
Delbonis F.
6-17-5
R64
Dimitrov G.
Basilashvili N.[15]
6-32-0
Ruusuvuori E.
Otte O.
6-46-3
Sinner J.[9]
Coric B.
6-32-66-3
Carreno Busta P.[13]
Baez S.
6-44-66-2
Bublik A.
Wawrinka S.
3-67-56-2
Delbonis F.
Munar J.
6-43-66-4
Fucsovics M.
Harris L.
6-46-756-1
Martinez P.
Humbert U.
6-47-65
Davidovich Fokina A.
Giron M.
7-56-3
Goffin D.
Lehecka J.
6-46-3
Evans D.
Bonzi B.
6-07-64
Fritz T.[10]
Catarina L.
6-767-656-4
Cilic M.
Tsonga J.
6-26-2
Korda S.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-56-4
Rune H.
Karatsev A.
7-614-66-3
Lajovic D.
Krajinovic F.
6-27-64
Hurkacz H.[11]
Dellien H.
7-56-4
Ramos A.
Griekspoor T.
6-44-66-2
Musetti L.
Paire B.
6-26-746-2
Schwartzman D.[12]
Khachanov K.
6-756-36-3
Sonego L.[16]
Ivashka I.
6-36-3
Djere L.
Cressy M.
6-46-776-2
Fognini F.
Rinderknech A.
7-54-66-3
De Minaur A.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-4