Andrey Rublev vs Daniel Evans — Indian Wells CH Semi-final
Indian Wells CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
RUS7#16ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
GBR#501ATP
1588ELO
1562Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
Rublev A.6-2 6-2
Evans D.
Rublev A.
662
Evans D.
220
Andrey Rublev defeated Daniel Evans 6-2 6-2 in the Indian Wells CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Andrey Rublev came in ranked #16, leading the head-to-head 4–3. Andrey Rublev extended the head-to-head to 5–3.
Key context
- Match story: Andrey Rublev dropped just 4 games past Daniel Evans.
Head to head
4–3| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-16 | Australian Open | R32 | hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-4 6-2 6-3 |
| 2022-08-08 | Canada Masters | R32 | hard | Daniel Evans | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2022-05-02 | Madrid Masters | R16 | clay | Andrey Rublev | 7-6(7) 7-5 |
| 2022-02-21 | Dubai | R32 | hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-4 7-5 |
| 2020-08-24 | Cincinnati Masters | R64 | hard | Daniel Evans | 7-5 3-6 6-2 |
| 2020-02-24 | Dubai | QF | hard | Daniel Evans | 6-2 7-6(9) |
| 2020-01-13 | Adelaide | QF | hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Rublev A.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Serve & return on hard
Rublev A.Evans D.
55
Serve
—
52
Return
—
Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.9
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.1
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Quarter-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Maden Y.[8]
3-66-06-3
Evans D.
Jung J.[14]
6-46-4
Rublev A.[7]
Bolt A.[13]
6-46-3
Harris L.[5]
Caruso S.
7-646-3
R16
Evans D.
Giraldo S.
6-16-2
Harris L.[5]
Young D.
6-46-2
Maden Y.[8]
Majchrzak K.
6-27-5
Jung J.[14]
Krajinovic F.[2]
7-56-3
Bolt A.[13]
Donskoy E.[4]
6-33-67-5
Rublev A.[7]
Polansky P.[11]
6-27-5
Caruso S.
Redlicki M.
7-682-67-61
Edmund K.[1]
Rosol L.[16]
6-36-4
R32
Giraldo S.
Donaldson J.[9]
6-22-66-4
Rosol L.[16]
Watanuki Y.
7-657-66
Edmund K.[1]
Robredo T.
6-46-4
Redlicki M.
Blanch U.
6-33-66-1
Krajinovic F.[2]
Aragone J.
6-23-67-5
Jung J.[14]
Krueger M.
6-16-4
Evans D.
Istomin D.[6]
6-46-4
Donskoy E.[4]
Zopp J.
6-37-63
Bolt A.[13]
Krstin P.
6-36-4
Polansky P.[11]
Harrison C.
6-43-67-64
Rublev A.[7]
Smith J.
6-27-5
Harris L.[5]
Eubanks C.
7-656-746-0
Young D.
Laaksonen H.[10]
7-53-66-4
Caruso S.
Lacko L.[15]
4-66-36-1
Maden Y.[8]
Escobedo E.
7-636-3
Majchrzak K.
Kecmanovic M.[12]
6-26-3
R64
Krueger M.
Milojevic N.
7-56-4
Giraldo S.
Novikov D.
7-55-76-2
Evans D.
Cressy M.
6-47-5
Zopp J.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.
Giron M.
7-56-3
Aragone J.
Nakashima B.
6-16-4
Krstin P.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-4
Harrison C.
Smyczek T.
6-44-66-3
Smith J.
Rubin N.
6-726-36-4
Young D.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-17-64
Caruso S.
Quiroz R.
7-56-2
Blanch U.
Brooksby J.
4-66-26-2
Escobedo E.
Redlicki M.
6-37-63
Majchrzak K.
King D.
6-46-3
Watanuki Y.
Khan Z.
3-66-26-2
Robredo T.
Koepfer D.
4-67-56-2