Alex De Minaur vs Taylor Fritz — Surbiton CH Round of 16
Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS6#5ATP
1961ELO
1834Grass ELO
$2.4MYTD
$25MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 June 2018
grass
USA#10ATP
1909ELO
1857Grass ELO
$1.6MYTD
$31MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
De Minaur A.6-4 7-6
Fritz T.
De Minaur A.
6772
Fritz T.
4640
Alex De Minaur defeated Taylor Fritz 6-4 7-6 in the Surbiton CH round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Alex De Minaur came in ranked #5, leading the head-to-head 6–5. Alex De Minaur extended the head-to-head to 7–5.
Key context
- Match story: Alex De Minaur edged Taylor Fritz in two tight sets (6–4 7–6).
Head to head
6–5| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-09 | Tour Finals | RR | hard | Alex De Minaur | 7-6(3) 6-3 |
| 2024-11-21 | Davis Cup Finals QF: USA vs AUS | RR | hard | Taylor Fritz | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2024-11-11 | Tour Finals | RR | hard | Taylor Fritz | 5-7 6-4 6-3 |
| 2024-01-01 | United Cup | RR | hard | Alex De Minaur | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2023-08-07 | Canada Masters | R16 | hard | Alex De Minaur | 7-6(7) 4-6 6-1 |
| 2022-06-20 | Eastbourne | SF | grass | Taylor Fritz | 6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 |
| 2022-03-07 | Indian Wells Masters | R16 | hard | Taylor Fritz | 3-6 6-4 7-6(5) |
| 2021-08-30 | US Open | R128 | hard | Taylor Fritz | 7-6(4) 6-2 1-6 6-4 |
| 2019-10-21 | Basel | R16 | hard | Alex De Minaur | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2019-07-22 | Atlanta | F | hard | Alex De Minaur | 6-3 7-6(2) |
| 2018-11-05 | NextGen Finals | RR | hard | Alex De Minaur | 4-3(8) 4-1 4-2 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
55%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
69%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
11.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
95
87
Break points saved·Even
99
100
Break points won·Dominant
97
60
Deciding sets·Even
97
98
Tiebreaks·Even
99
99
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Freshness
Recent loadFreshness·Slight edge
83
76
De Minaur A.: 8 days rest · 4 matches (14d) · Fritz T.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Quarter-finals
Chardy J.[1]
Kudla D.
7-654-67-68
Evans D.
Melzer J.
7-636-4
De Minaur A.[6]
Bhambri Y.[3]
6-37-5
Ebden M.
Stakhovsky S.
6-46-4
R16
Stakhovsky S.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-64
Ebden M.
Mcdonald M.[7]
6-36-756-3
Evans D.
Moraing M.
7-646-3
Melzer J.
King K.
6-46-4
Kudla D.
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-0
Bhambri Y.[3]
Bolt A.
6-43-66-1
De Minaur A.[6]
Fritz T.
6-47-64
Chardy J.[1]
Brands D.
7-636-3
R32
Brands D.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-34-67-5
Ebden M.
Brown D.
6-757-56-3
Mcdonald M.[7]
Polansky P.
6-747-56-3
Fritz T.
Glasspool L.
4-66-36-4
Moraing M.
Fratangelo B.[8]
3-66-37-64
Melzer J.
Polmans M.
6-43-67-62
King K.
Youzhny M.[4]
7-647-5
Kudla D.
Bublik A.
3-67-656-1
Chardy J.[1]
Broady L.
7-6106-3
Evans D.
Fabbiano T.
6-47-5
Ramanathan R.
Thompson J.[2]
6-43-66-1
Bolt A.
Clarke J.
6-16-736-3
De Minaur A.[6]
Ward A.
6-46-1
Bhambri Y.[3]
Kokkinakis T.
6-47-64
Lacko L.[5]
Novikov D.
4-66-17-5
Stakhovsky S.
Ward J.
4-66-36-3