Tommy Paul vs Cameron Norrie — Fairfield CH Round of 16

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Tommy Paul
USA
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 October 2016
hard
Cameron Norrie
GBR
Cameron Norrie
#38ATP
1829ELO
1789Hard ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Paul T.
1-6 6-3 6-4
Norrie C.
Paul T.
1662
Norrie C.
6341

Tommy Paul defeated Cameron Norrie 1-6 6-3 6-4 in the Fairfield CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tommy Paul came in ranked #24, defending last year's round of 16. Tommy Paul narrowed the head-to-head to 3–3.

Key context

Head to head

2–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-03-05Indian Wells MastersR32hardTommy Paul6-3 7-5
2022-06-27WimbledonR16grassCameron Norrie6-4 7-5 6-4
2022-02-14Delray BeachSFhardCameron Norrie6-3 6-3
2021-10-04Indian Wells MastersR16hardCameron Norrie6-4 4-6 6-2
2021-02-01Murray River OpenR64hardTommy Paul4-6 7-6(2) 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Norrie C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Serve advantage — Paul T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Paul T.Norrie C.
71
Serve
45
54
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Norrie C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.2
5.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Norrie C.
Clutch Rating·Even
93
90
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Even
87
83
Deciding sets·Even
98
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
96
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Norrie C.
Freshness·Slight edge
91
100

Paul T.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Norrie C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Giraldo S.[2]
Halys Q.
4-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Giraldo S.[2]
De Loore J.
6-36-4
Halys Q.
Klein B.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Halys Q.
Marterer M.[8]
6-00-0
Giraldo S.[2]
Zemlja G.[7]
6-16-4
De Loore J.
Giannessi A.[5]
6-46-1
Klein B.
Paul T.
7-653-66-1
R16
Giraldo S.[2]
Baker B.
6-45-76-4
Zemlja G.[7]
Nevolo D.
6-26-3
Giannessi A.[5]
Sonego L.
6-26-4
Klein B.
Bemelmans R.
6-35-77-64
Marterer M.[8]
Opelka R.
3-67-647-5
Halys Q.
Tiafoe F.[1]
6-24-67-5
De Loore J.
Smyczek T.[3]
6-47-65
Paul T.
Norrie C.
1-66-36-4
R32
Zemlja G.[7]
Rubin N.
7-627-64
Baker B.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-4
Norrie C.
Fawcett T.
6-46-1
Klein B.
Sandgren T.
4-67-57-5
Bemelmans R.
King D.[4]
5-77-57-64
Marterer M.[8]
Broady L.
7-56-4
Opelka R.
Podlipnik Castillo H.
6-36-1
Halys Q.
Nguyen D.
5-76-46-2
Tiafoe F.[1]
Rola B.
7-666-3
Giannessi A.[5]
Mcgee J.
6-727-666-3
Giraldo S.[2]
Mmoh M.
6-37-5
Nevolo D.
Bangoura S.
6-47-65
Smyczek T.[3]
Shapovalov D.
6-26-4
De Loore J.
Smith K.
7-626-3
Sonego L.
Dancevic F.
6-36-0
Paul T.
Novikov D.[6]
6-46-4