Daniel Evans vs Andrey Rublev — Dallas CH Round of 32

Dallas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Daniel Evans
GBR
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1562Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 February 2016
hard
Andrey Rublev
RUS
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Evans D.
5-7 6-4 6-3
Rublev A.
Evans D.
5662
Rublev A.
7431

Daniel Evans defeated Andrey Rublev 5-7 6-4 6-3 in the Dallas CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Andrey Rublev came in ranked #16, leading the head-to-head 4–3, defending last year's quarter-final. Daniel Evans narrowed the head-to-head to 4–4.

Key context

Head to head

3–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-01-16Australian OpenR32hardAndrey Rublev6-4 6-2 6-3
2022-08-08Canada MastersR32hardDaniel Evans6-4 6-4
2022-05-02Madrid MastersR16clayAndrey Rublev7-6(7) 7-5
2022-02-21DubaiR32hardAndrey Rublev6-4 7-5
2020-08-24Cincinnati MastersR64hardDaniel Evans7-5 3-6 6-2
2020-02-24DubaiQFhardDaniel Evans6-2 7-6(9)
2020-01-13AdelaideQFhardAndrey Rublev6-4 3-6 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Evans D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Rublev A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Serve advantage — Rublev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Evans D.Rublev A.
—
Serve
55
—
Return
49

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Evans D.Rublev A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
7.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Evans D.Rublev A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
73
88
Break points saved·Even
97
100
Break points won·Slight edge
61
72
Deciding sets·Clear edge
82
97
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Evans D.Rublev A.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Evans D.: 20 days rest · Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Edmund K.[2]
Evans D.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Edmund K.[2]
Smyczek T.[4]
7-56-3
Evans D.
Ito T.[6]
6-24-66-1
Quarter-finals
Ito T.[6]
Tiafoe F.
3-67-56-4
Edmund K.[2]
Zemlja G.
7-56-1
Smyczek T.[4]
Matosevic M.
7-644-66-3
Evans D.
Becker B.[3]
6-16-4
R16
Edmund K.[2]
Mcgee J.
6-36-4
Zemlja G.
Smith J.[7]
4-66-36-4
Smyczek T.[4]
Harrison R.
6-05-76-4
Matosevic M.
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Evans D.
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-26-3
Becker B.[3]
Escobedo E.
6-46-2
Ito T.[6]
Laaksonen H.
6-27-65
Tiafoe F.
Vaks M.
6-46-4
R32
Zemlja G.
Jung J.
6-44-67-65
Fratangelo B.[8]
Donaldson J.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.
Thompson C.
6-37-66
Ito T.[6]
Molchanov D.
6-26-757-66
Laaksonen H.
Michalicka M.
7-56-1
Vaks M.
Smith C.
6-46-2
Smyczek T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-46-3
Evans D.
Rublev A.
5-76-46-3
Becker B.[3]
Andersen J.
6-46-3
Edmund K.[2]
Bangoura S.
7-646-2
Mcgee J.
Novikov D.
5-76-16-4
Smith J.[7]
Quigley E.
7-666-3
Harrison R.
Kuznetsov A.
2-67-57-5
Trungelliti M.
Barrientos N.
6-37-66
Matosevic M.
Albot R.[5]
6-44-66-4
Tiafoe F.
Groth S.[1]
6-36-3