Dennis Novikov vs Jason Jung — Binghamton CH Round of 32

Binghamton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Dennis Novikov
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 July 2015
hard
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
Novikov D.
4-6 6-3 7-6
Jung J.
Novikov D.
467102
Jung J.
63681

Dennis Novikov defeated Jason Jung 4-6 6-3 7-6 in the Binghamton CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Dennis Novikov came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Dennis Novikov extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-06-12s HertogenboschQ2grassDennis Novikov7-6(6) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Novikov D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Novikov D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Novikov D.Jung J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.8
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Novikov D.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Even
19
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
78
64
Break points won·Slight edge
2
8
Deciding sets·Even
24
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Novikov D.Jung J.
Freshness·
—
78

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Edmund K.[1]
Fratangelo B.[2]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Bangoura S.
6-37-64
Fratangelo B.[2]
Klein B.[6]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Bangoura S.
Novikov D.
3-66-37-69
Klein B.[6]
Nielsen F.
2-66-36-4
Fratangelo B.[2]
Meister N.
6-14-67-5
R16
Nielsen F.
Pecotic M.
7-56-4
Bangoura S.
Donaldson J.[5]
6-46-2
Edmund K.[1]
Rubin N.
7-56-736-4
Krueger M.
Paul T.
7-56-4
Novikov D.
Kuznetsov A.
6-47-5
Klein B.[6]
Corrie E.
6-36-2
Meister N.
Kutrovsky D.
7-663-67-63
Fratangelo B.[2]
Tiafoe F.
4-66-36-4
R32
Krueger M.
Myneni S.[8]
6-46-3
Rubin N.
Jasika O.
6-36-3
Nielsen F.
Broady L.[3]
6-14-66-2
Kutrovsky D.
Nguyen D.[7]
6-16-1
Paul T.
Escobar G.
6-37-5
Edmund K.[1]
Escobedo E.
7-56-746-1
Kuznetsov A.
Clezar G.[4]
6-16-3
Novikov D.
Jung J.
4-66-37-68
Bangoura S.
Opelka R.
4-66-36-4
Donaldson J.[5]
Niki T.
6-36-2
Klein B.[6]
Giron M.
2-67-676-4
Corrie E.
Sweeting R.
7-56-2
Pecotic M.
Pavic A.
7-656-4
Meister N.
Jarry N.
6-17-66
Tiafoe F.
Barrere G.
6-47-61
Fratangelo B.[2]
Jones G.
7-52-66-2