Kyle Edmund vs Ernesto Escobedo — Binghamton CH Round of 32

Binghamton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR1
Kyle Edmund
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 July 2015
hard
MEX
Ernesto Escobedo
#1650ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWWW
Edmund K.
7-5 6-7 6-1
Escobedo E.
Edmund K.
76462
Escobedo E.
57711

Kyle Edmund defeated Ernesto Escobedo 7-5 6-7 6-1 in the Binghamton CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Kyle Edmund came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Kyle Edmund extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Kyle Edmund came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-01-02BrisbaneR32hardKyle Edmund7-6(4) 7-6(6)
2016-08-29US OpenR64hardKyle Edmund7-5 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Edmund K.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Escobedo E.

Escobedo E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Edmund K.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Edmund K.Escobedo E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Even
5.9
5.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Edmund K.Escobedo E.
Clutch Rating·Even
32
28
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
84
Break points won·Slight edge
21
12
Deciding sets·Slight edge
25
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Edmund K.[1]
Fratangelo B.[2]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Bangoura S.
6-37-64
Fratangelo B.[2]
Klein B.[6]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Bangoura S.
Novikov D.
3-66-37-69
Klein B.[6]
Nielsen F.
2-66-36-4
Fratangelo B.[2]
Meister N.
6-14-67-5
R16
Nielsen F.
Pecotic M.
7-56-4
Bangoura S.
Donaldson J.[5]
6-46-2
Edmund K.[1]
Rubin N.
7-56-736-4
Krueger M.
Paul T.
7-56-4
Novikov D.
Kuznetsov A.
6-47-5
Klein B.[6]
Corrie E.
6-36-2
Meister N.
Kutrovsky D.
7-663-67-63
Fratangelo B.[2]
Tiafoe F.
4-66-36-4
R32
Krueger M.
Myneni S.[8]
6-46-3
Rubin N.
Jasika O.
6-36-3
Nielsen F.
Broady L.[3]
6-14-66-2
Kutrovsky D.
Nguyen D.[7]
6-16-1
Paul T.
Escobar G.
6-37-5
Edmund K.[1]
Escobedo E.
7-56-746-1
Kuznetsov A.
Clezar G.[4]
6-16-3
Novikov D.
Jung J.
4-66-37-68
Bangoura S.
Opelka R.
4-66-36-4
Donaldson J.[5]
Niki T.
6-36-2
Klein B.[6]
Giron M.
2-67-676-4
Corrie E.
Sweeting R.
7-56-2
Pecotic M.
Pavic A.
7-656-4
Meister N.
Jarry N.
6-17-66
Tiafoe F.
Barrere G.
6-47-61
Fratangelo B.[2]
Jones G.
7-52-66-2