Sekou Bangoura vs Reilly Opelka — Binghamton CH Round of 32

Binghamton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Sekou Bangoura
#1964ATP
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 July 2015
hard
Reilly Opelka
USA
Reilly Opelka
#131ATP
1749ELO
1734Hard ELO
$325kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 211 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
Bangoura S.
4-6 6-3 6-4
Opelka R.
Bangoura S.
4662
Opelka R.
6341

Sekou Bangoura defeated Reilly Opelka 4-6 6-3 6-4 in the Binghamton CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Reilly Opelka came in ranked #131.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bangoura S.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Opelka R.

Opelka R.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Bangoura S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bangoura S.Opelka R.
—
Serve
86
—
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bangoura S.Opelka R.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
70%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
28%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
70%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.6
17.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bangoura S.Opelka R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
15
63
Break points saved·Dominant
67
100
Break points won·Clear edge
13
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
29
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
5
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Edmund K.[1]
Fratangelo B.[2]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Bangoura S.
6-37-64
Fratangelo B.[2]
Klein B.[6]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Krueger M.
6-36-2
Bangoura S.
Novikov D.
3-66-37-69
Klein B.[6]
Nielsen F.
2-66-36-4
Fratangelo B.[2]
Meister N.
6-14-67-5
R16
Nielsen F.
Pecotic M.
7-56-4
Bangoura S.
Donaldson J.[5]
6-46-2
Edmund K.[1]
Rubin N.
7-56-736-4
Krueger M.
Paul T.
7-56-4
Novikov D.
Kuznetsov A.
6-47-5
Klein B.[6]
Corrie E.
6-36-2
Meister N.
Kutrovsky D.
7-663-67-63
Fratangelo B.[2]
Tiafoe F.
4-66-36-4
R32
Krueger M.
Myneni S.[8]
6-46-3
Rubin N.
Jasika O.
6-36-3
Nielsen F.
Broady L.[3]
6-14-66-2
Kutrovsky D.
Nguyen D.[7]
6-16-1
Paul T.
Escobar G.
6-37-5
Edmund K.[1]
Escobedo E.
7-56-746-1
Kuznetsov A.
Clezar G.[4]
6-16-3
Novikov D.
Jung J.
4-66-37-68
Bangoura S.
Opelka R.
4-66-36-4
Donaldson J.[5]
Niki T.
6-36-2
Klein B.[6]
Giron M.
2-67-676-4
Corrie E.
Sweeting R.
7-56-2
Pecotic M.
Pavic A.
7-656-4
Meister N.
Jarry N.
6-17-66
Tiafoe F.
Barrere G.
6-47-61
Fratangelo B.[2]
Jones G.
7-52-66-2