Agustin Calleri vs Nicolas MassuNew Haven Quarter-final

New Haven · ATP · Quarter-final
49 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 August 2006
hard
46 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Calleri A.
6-3 3-6 6-4
Massu N.
Calleri A.
6362
Massu N.
3641

Agustin Calleri defeated Nicolas Massu 6-3 3-6 6-4 in the New Haven quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Agustin Calleri came in leading the head-to-head 5–2. Agustin Calleri extended the head-to-head to 6–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Agustin Calleri closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

52
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2009-02-02Vina del MarR32clayAgustin Calleri7-6(4) 6-1
2006-07-24KitzbuhelR16clayAgustin Calleri6-2 7-6(4)
2006-03-06Indian Wells MastersR128hardNicolas Massu6-1 5-7 7-6(10)
2005-10-03MetzR32hardAgustin Calleri7-5 7-5
2004-10-04LyonR32clayAgustin Calleri6-3 6-4
2003-02-17Buenos AiresR32clayAgustin Calleri6-4 2-6 6-4
2002-02-18Buenos AiresFclayNicolas Massu2-6 7-6(5) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Calleri A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Massu N.

Massu N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Calleri A.

Serve advantage — Calleri A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.3
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (152 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
46
47
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
80
Break points won·Even
48
47
Deciding sets·Slight edge
52
46
Tiebreaks·Even
52
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About