Jurgen Melzer vs Feliciano LopezNew Haven Round of 32

New Haven · ATP · Round of 32
45 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 August 2006
hard
44 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLW
Melzer J.
6-7 7-6 6-4
Lopez F.
Melzer J.
637762
Lopez F.
776141

Jurgen Melzer defeated Feliciano Lopez 6-7 7-6 6-4 in the New Haven round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jurgen Melzer came in leading the head-to-head 4–2, defending last year's round of 32. Jurgen Melzer extended the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

Head to head

42
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-05-06Madrid MastersR64clayJurgen Melzer3-6 7-6(6) 6-4
2010-06-21WimbledonR32grassJurgen Melzer4-6 6-3 6-2 6-4
2009-10-11Shanghai MastersR16hardFeliciano Lopez5-7 7-6(3) 6-1
2009-08-16Cincinnati MastersR64hardJurgen Melzer5-7 7-6(4) 7-6(7)
2008-10-06ViennaQFhardFeliciano Lopez4-6 6-3 6-4
2008-08-25US OpenR128hardJurgen Melzer4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 2-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Melzer J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Lopez F.

Lopez F.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Melzer J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
32%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.0
11.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
44
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
98
Break points won·Dominant
27
2
Deciding sets·Even
65
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
27
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About