Nikolay Davydenko vs Paradorn SrichaphanNew Haven Round of 16

New Haven · ATP · Round of 16
45 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 August 2006
hard
47 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWW
Davydenko N.
6-4 6-1
Srichaphan P.
Davydenko N.
662
Srichaphan P.
41

Nikolay Davydenko defeated Paradorn Srichaphan 6-4 6-1 in the New Haven round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Paradorn Srichaphan came in leading the head-to-head 3–1, defending last year's round of 16, but Nikolay Davydenko had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 5 on hard. Nikolay Davydenko narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

13
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2006-09-11BeijingQFhardParadorn Srichaphan6-2 1-0 RET
2005-08-29US OpenR64hardParadorn Srichaphan6-4 7-5 6-3
2004-02-16RotterdamR32hardNikolay Davydenko6-4 6-3
2003-08-18Long IslandR32hardParadorn Srichaphan6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Davydenko N.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Srichaphan P.

Srichaphan P.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Davydenko N.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Clear edge
68%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
55%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
33%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
6.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
69
Break points won·Dominant
74
46
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
50
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
72
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About