Jakub Mensik vs Andrey RublevRoland Garros Round of 16

Roland Garros · ATP · Round of 16
#18ATP
1931ELO
1861Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$6.9MCAREER
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
3 — 2
Sets
Sunday, 31 May 2026 ·
clay
Court Suzanne-Lenglen · 4th on
#13ATP
1902ELO
1872Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
Mensik J.
6-3 7-6 4-6 2-6 6-3
Rublev A.
Mensik J.
6784263
Rublev A.
3666632

Jakub Mensik came through a 49-game battle to beat Andrey Rublev 6-3 7-6 4-6 2-6 6-3 in the Roland Garros round of 16.

Key context

  • Set 1, game 6: A 13-point game with four deuces went Andrey Rublev's way.
  • Set 1, game 6: Andrey Rublev saved three break points to hold serve.
  • Set 5, game 8: Jakub Mensik broke serve.
  • Pressure points: Jakub Mensik converted 4 of 18 break points; Andrey Rublev converted 5 of 15 break points.

Pressure & serve by court

Mensik J.
Rublev A.
Break points won
4/18
5/15
Break points saved
10/15
14/18

Break points from this match. Serve-by-court shows the share of service points won from each side of the court; the court side alternates every point.

Head to head

20
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-10-02Shanghai MastersR64hardJakub Mensik6-7(7) 6-4 6-3
2024-02-19DohaQFhardJakub Mensik6-4 7-6(6)

Serve vs return

This season
Mensik J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Rublev A.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mensik J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Mensik J.Rublev A.
Serve
14
Return
62

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
79%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
66%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
65%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.0
6.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
88
89
Break points saved·Even
98
100
Break points won·Slight edge
77
72
Deciding sets·Slight edge
92
97
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Clay Elo 1782
Surface ELO
6.1+86 Clay Elo edge
4.9Overall Elo 1898
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1905
5.0First meeting on clay
H2H
5.0First meeting on clay
6.76 of last 10 on clay
Surface form
8.18 of last 10 on clay
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.03 three-setters in 14 days
3-set count
0.03 three-setters in 14 days
Country comfort
5.9Won 66% in FRA (61)
Context
6.0Reached the R64 here last year
Defending pts
6.0Reached the last 16 here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Slight edge
88
95

Mensik J.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Rublev A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
23°COvercast
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 49%
R128
R64
R32
R16
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Final