Jakub Mensik vs Andrey Rublev — Doha Quarter-final

Doha · ATP · Quarter-final
Jakub Mensik
CZE
Jakub Mensik
#18ATP
1931ELO
1893Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$6.9MCAREER
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 February 2024
hard
Andrey Rublev
RUS1
Andrey Rublev
#13ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Mensik J.
6-4 7-6
Rublev A.
Mensik J.
6782
Rublev A.
4660

Jakub Mensik defeated Andrey Rublev 6-4 7-6 in the Doha quarter-final on hard. Jakub Mensik extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-31Roland GarrosR16clayJakub Mensik6-3 7.8-6.6 4-6 2-6 6-3
2024-10-02Shanghai MastersR64hardJakub Mensik6-7(7) 6-4 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Mensik J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Rublev A.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Mensik J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mensik J.Rublev A.
42
Serve
55
51
Return
52

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mensik J.Rublev A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
67%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.2
7.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 150). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mensik J.Rublev A.
Clutch Rating·Even
88
88
Break points saved·Even
98
100
Break points won·Slight edge
77
72
Deciding sets·Slight edge
92
97
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mensik J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Rublev A.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+44 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Hard Elo 1849
5.6Overall Elo 1931
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1902
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
7.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
6.1
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mensik J.Rublev A.
Freshness·Slight edge
86
94

Mensik J.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Rublev A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
24°CClear
Wind 27 km/hHumidity 34%
Final
Khachanov K.[2]
Mensik J.
7-6126-4
Semi-finals
Mensik J.
Monfils G.
6-41-66-3
Khachanov K.[2]
Popyrin A.
7-6126-2
Quarter-finals
Khachanov K.[2]
Ruusuvuori E.
3-0
Mensik J.
Rublev A.[1]
6-47-66
Monfils G.
Humbert U.[3]
6-26-4
Popyrin A.
Bublik A.[4]
6-46-4
R16
Mensik J.
Murray A.
7-666-737-64
Rublev A.[1]
Gasquet R.
6-36-4
Popyrin A.
Grenier H.
7-636-786-1
Bublik A.[4]
Fucsovics M.
2-66-36-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Oconnell C.
6-36-3
Khachanov K.[2]
Marozsan F.
6-47-5
Humbert U.[3]
Kotov P.
6-46-1
Monfils G.
Zhang Z.
4-67-57-62
R32
Zhang Z.
Musetti L.[7]
6-26-0
Fucsovics M.
Bautista Agut R.
6-16-3
Monfils G.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-17-69
Ruusuvuori E.
Zeppieri G.
7-627-5
Gasquet R.
Shevchenko A.
6-46-4
Murray A.
Muller A.
6-17-65
Mensik J.
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
7-636-4
Kotov P.
Sonego L.
6-27-5
Grenier H.
Marterer M.
7-657-5
Oconnell C.
Struff J.[6]
6-46-4
Marozsan F.
Kopriva V.
7-57-66
Popyrin A.
Shelbayh A.
3-66-36-4