Elijah Sanogo vs Ivan Marrero Curbelo — Abidjan 2 CH Round of 32

Abidjan 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Elijah Sanogo
#1146ATP
18 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 April 2026
hard
ESP
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
#374ATP
1303ELO
1237Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWW
Sanogo E.
7-6 7-6
Marrero Curbelo I.
Sanogo E.
77772
Marrero Curbelo I.
64640

Elijah Sanogo defeated Ivan Marrero Curbelo 7-6 7-6 in the Abidjan 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sanogo E.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Marrero Curbelo I.

Marrero Curbelo I.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Sanogo E.

Serve advantage — Marrero Curbelo I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sanogo E.Marrero Curbelo I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
57%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.6
0.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (5 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sanogo E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Marrero Curbelo I.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Onclin G.[1]
Mmoh M.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Mmoh M.[2]
Visker N.
6-766-40-0
Onclin G.[1]
Coulibaly E.[4]
2-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Coulibaly E.[4]
Stewart H.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.[2]
Hemery C.
3-67-56-3
Onclin G.[1]
Alkaya M.
6-37-63
Visker N.
Bax F.[3]
7-646-3
R16
Visker N.
Geerts M.[6]
7-676-737-63
Onclin G.[1]
Giunta M.
6-767-626-0
Alkaya M.
Jubb P.[5]
6-16-4
Coulibaly E.[4]
Bennani K.
6-16-3
Stewart H.
Bicknell B.[8]
7-634-67-66
Bax F.[3]
Dougaz A.
6-43-67-63
Hemery C.
Kasnikowski M.[7]
4-67-656-3
Mmoh M.[2]
Sanogo E.
6-06-2
R32
Visker N.
Lalami Laaroussi Y.
6-24-2
Geerts M.[6]
Xilas I.
6-46-4
Bax F.[3]
Strombachs R.
6-37-62
Sanogo E.
Marrero Curbelo I.
7-647-64
Jubb P.[5]
Singh D.
7-606-1
Bennani K.
Singh K.
6-746-46-2
Stewart H.
Vishal Balsekar A.
6-26-1
Dougaz A.
Hurrion M.
6-46-3
Mmoh M.[2]
Fenty A.
7-626-736-4
Bicknell B.[8]
Artnak B.
4-3
Giunta M.
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
6-46-4
Coulibaly E.[4]
Poulsen O.
6-27-64
Onclin G.[1]
Weightman O.
6-36-2
Alkaya M.
Mukund S.
6-36-756-3
Kasnikowski M.[7]
Bouchelaghem C.
6-46-4
Hemery C.
Chazal M.
6-46-4