Mert Alkaya vs Paul Jubb — Abidjan 2 CH Round of 16

Abidjan 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
TUR
Mert Alkaya
#332ATP
1358ELO
1337Hard ELO
26 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 April 2026
hard
GBR5
Paul Jubb
#331ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWL
Alkaya M.
6-1 6-4
Jubb P.
Alkaya M.
662
Jubb P.
140

Mert Alkaya defeated Paul Jubb 6-1 6-4 in the Abidjan 2 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Alkaya M.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Jubb P.serving77% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Alkaya M.

Serve advantage — Jubb P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Alkaya M.Jubb P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
52%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
43%
Break points saved·Clear edge
64%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (14 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Alkaya M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Jubb P.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.5Hard Elo 1337
Surface ELO
4.5+67 Hard Elo edge
5.5Overall Elo 1358
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1426
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
4.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
7.3
4.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Alkaya M.Jubb P.
Freshness·
—
100

Jubb P.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Onclin G.[1]
Mmoh M.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Mmoh M.[2]
Visker N.
6-766-40-0
Onclin G.[1]
Coulibaly E.[4]
2-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Coulibaly E.[4]
Stewart H.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.[2]
Hemery C.
3-67-56-3
Onclin G.[1]
Alkaya M.
6-37-63
Visker N.
Bax F.[3]
7-646-3
R16
Visker N.
Geerts M.[6]
7-676-737-63
Onclin G.[1]
Giunta M.
6-767-626-0
Alkaya M.
Jubb P.[5]
6-16-4
Coulibaly E.[4]
Bennani K.
6-16-3
Stewart H.
Bicknell B.[8]
7-634-67-66
Bax F.[3]
Dougaz A.
6-43-67-63
Hemery C.
Kasnikowski M.[7]
4-67-656-3
Mmoh M.[2]
Sanogo E.
6-06-2
R32
Visker N.
Lalami Laaroussi Y.
6-24-2
Geerts M.[6]
Xilas I.
6-46-4
Bax F.[3]
Strombachs R.
6-37-62
Sanogo E.
Marrero Curbelo I.
7-647-64
Jubb P.[5]
Singh D.
7-606-1
Bennani K.
Singh K.
6-746-46-2
Stewart H.
Vishal Balsekar A.
6-26-1
Dougaz A.
Hurrion M.
6-46-3
Mmoh M.[2]
Fenty A.
7-626-736-4
Bicknell B.[8]
Artnak B.
4-3
Giunta M.
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
6-46-4
Coulibaly E.[4]
Poulsen O.
6-27-64
Onclin G.[1]
Weightman O.
6-36-2
Alkaya M.
Mukund S.
6-36-756-3
Kasnikowski M.[7]
Bouchelaghem C.
6-46-4
Hemery C.
Chazal M.
6-46-4