Nicolas Jarry vs Nerman Fatic — Madrid CH Quarter-final

Madrid CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Nicolas Jarry
CHI6
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1642Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 April 2026
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Jarry N.
6-1 6-4
Fatic N.
Jarry N.
662
Fatic N.
140

Nicolas Jarry defeated Nerman Fatic 6-1 6-4 in the Madrid CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jarry N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jarry N.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
71%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
39%
Break points saved·Even
53%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.8
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.2
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (11 vs 15). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jarry N.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
24
Break points saved·Dominant
98
63
Break points won·Dominant
4
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jarry N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+163 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Clay Elo 1478
6.9Overall Elo 1648
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.1
Surface form
3.3
0.0Lost last 16
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.4
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[5]
Rodionov J.
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.
Jarry N.[6]
6-767-647-64
Piros Z.[5]
Samuel T.[8]
4-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Samuel T.[8]
Schwaerzler J.
7-677-62
Jarry N.[6]
Fatic N.
6-16-4
Piros Z.[5]
Moro Canas A.
4-66-36-4
Rodionov J.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-4
R16
Piros Z.[5]
Hemery C.
6-06-2
Jarry N.[6]
Stricker D.
6-27-65
Samuel T.[8]
Sakellaridis S.
6-23-67-62
Moro Canas A.
Llamas Ruiz P.[4]
6-47-65
Fatic N.
Agamenone F.
6-34-67-61
Rodionov J.
Perez Contri S.
7-656-756-3
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-4
Schwaerzler J.
Safiullin R.
6-36-4
R32
Jarry N.[6]
Damas M.
6-10-0
Samuel T.[8]
Rincon D.
6-736-46-1
Llamas Ruiz P.[4]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-44-67-5
Piros Z.[5]
Shelbayh A.
6-12-66-1
Roca Batalla O.
Blanchet U.[7]
6-16-4
Schwaerzler J.
Butvilas E.
7-653-66-3
Safiullin R.
Dedura Palomero D.
6-47-5
Sakellaridis S.
Kolar Z.
7-57-62
Hemery C.
Martinez A.
6-27-63
Moro Canas A.
Bernet H.
6-46-1
Stricker D.
Nedic A.
6-36-716-2
Fatic N.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-747-666-1
Agamenone F.
Rodesch C.[3]
5-76-26-1
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Ivanov I.
7-56-2
Rodionov J.
Cina F.
6-46-3
Perez Contri S.
Gea A.[2]
6-23-66-1