Carl Emil Overbeck vs Tai Sach — Miyazaki CH Qualifying Round 2

Miyazaki CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
DEN5
Carl Emil Overbeck
#430ATP
1293ELO
1271Hard ELO
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
hard
AUS11
Tai Sach
#508ATP
1343ELO
1322Hard ELO
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLW
Overbeck C.
6-1 4-6 6-2
Sach T.
Overbeck C.
6462
Sach T.
1621

Carl Emil Overbeck defeated Tai Sach 6-1 4-6 6-2 in the Miyazaki CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Carl Emil Overbeck came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Overbeck C.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Sach T.

Sach T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Overbeck C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Overbeck C.Sach T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
34%
36%
Break points saved·Even
55%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.2
5.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (13 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Overbeck C.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Sach T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Hard Elo 1271
Surface ELO
5.6+51 Hard Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1293
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1343
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.0
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
7.8
4.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Tu L.[1]
Mochizuki Y.[12]
6-16-2
Matsuda K.[10]
Kusuhara Y.
6-46-2
Moriya H.[2]
Takahashi Y.[7]
6-42-66-2
Boulais J.[3]
Imamura M.[8]
6-06-2
Nam J.
Kikuchi Y.
6-46-4
Overbeck C.[5]
Sach T.[11]
6-14-66-2
Q1
Tu L.[1]
Deckers A.
6-36-3
Takahashi Y.[7]
Nakagawa N.
6-46-4
Sach T.[11]
Tabata R.
7-56-776-4
Kusuhara Y.
Huang T.[6]
5-4
Moriya H.[2]
Filar K.
6-06-756-4
Mochizuki Y.[12]
Nakagawa S.
6-27-5
Imamura M.[8]
Ichikawa T.
6-36-717-5
Nam J.
Kumasaka T.[4]
6-26-4
Kikuchi Y.
Matsuda R.[9]
6-36-2
Overbeck C.[5]
Isomura K.
6-31-0
Matsuda K.[10]
Nefve A.
4-66-27-65