Li Tu vs Yuki Mochizuki — Miyazaki CH Qualifying Round 2

Miyazaki CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
AUS1
Li Tu
#421ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
hard
JPN12
Yuki Mochizuki
28 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLWL
Tu L.
6-1 6-2
Mochizuki Y.
Tu L.
662
Mochizuki Y.
120

Li Tu defeated Yuki Mochizuki 6-1 6-2 in the Miyazaki CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Mochizuki Y.

Mochizuki Y.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve advantage — Tu L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Mochizuki Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
69%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
74%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
57%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
51%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mochizuki Y.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
3.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
9.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Tu L.[1]
Mochizuki Y.[12]
6-16-2
Matsuda K.[10]
Kusuhara Y.
6-46-2
Moriya H.[2]
Takahashi Y.[7]
6-42-66-2
Boulais J.[3]
Imamura M.[8]
6-06-2
Nam J.
Kikuchi Y.
6-46-4
Overbeck C.[5]
Sach T.[11]
6-14-66-2
Q1
Tu L.[1]
Deckers A.
6-36-3
Takahashi Y.[7]
Nakagawa N.
6-46-4
Sach T.[11]
Tabata R.
7-56-776-4
Kusuhara Y.
Huang T.[6]
5-4
Moriya H.[2]
Filar K.
6-06-756-4
Mochizuki Y.[12]
Nakagawa S.
6-27-5
Imamura M.[8]
Ichikawa T.
6-36-717-5
Nam J.
Kumasaka T.[4]
6-26-4
Kikuchi Y.
Matsuda R.[9]
6-36-2
Overbeck C.[5]
Isomura K.
6-31-0
Matsuda K.[10]
Nefve A.
4-66-27-65