Michael Mmoh vs Emilio Nava — Phoenix CH Round of 32

Phoenix CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#192ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 10 March 2026
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#86ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Mmoh M.
6-2 7-6
Nava E.
Mmoh M.
6772
Nava E.
2630

Michael Mmoh defeated Emilio Nava 6-2 7-6 in the Phoenix CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #86. Michael Mmoh extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Michael Mmoh closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-05DallasR32hardMichael Mmoh7-5 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Serve advantage — Mmoh M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mmoh M.Nava E.
—
Serve
39
—
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
63%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
65%
68%
Aces / match·Even
6.9
7.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
66
52
Break points saved·Even
91
94
Break points won·Clear edge
31
17
Deciding sets·Even
90
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Nava E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Hard Elo 1599
Surface ELO
5.2+22 Hard Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1613
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1704
10.0
H2H
0.0
3.7
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Nava E.
Freshness·Even
92
95

Mmoh M.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Nava E.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Quinn E.[8]
Giron M.[7]
7-614-67-5
Semi-finals
Giron M.[7]
Moutet C.[1]
4-66-36-4
Quinn E.[8]
Harris B.
7-667-65
Quarter-finals
Giron M.[7]
Borges N.[4]
7-686-2
Quinn E.[8]
Bonzi B.
7-647-67
Moutet C.[1]
Basilashvili N.
7-656-4
Harris B.
Mannarino A.[3]
6-46-746-4
R16
Basilashvili N.
Cazaux A.
W/O
Borges N.[4]
Duckworth J.
3-66-46-2
Giron M.[7]
Friend J.
7-54-67-69
Mannarino A.[3]
Bicknell B.
6-726-26-2
Bonzi B.
Riedi L.
6-36-3
Harris B.
Blanch D.
3-67-657-66
Quinn E.[8]
Mmoh M.
6-16-3
Moutet C.[1]
Halys Q.
6-46-4
R32
Halys Q.
Travaglia S.
4-67-637-65
Bonzi B.
Bolt A.
3-66-37-64
Harris B.
Vukic A.
7-667-63
Duckworth J.
Struff J.
6-736-46-4
Giron M.[7]
Merida Aguilar D.
6-06-1
Blanch D.
Atmane T.[5]
6-46-4
Bicknell B.
Krueger M.
7-655-76-4
Quinn E.[8]
Shevchenko A.
6-746-46-2
Mmoh M.
Nava E.
6-27-63
Cazaux A.
Fearnley J.
6-23-66-1
Friend J.
Kozlov S.
6-24-66-3
Basilashvili N.
Majchrzak K.[6]
7-636-3