Michael Mmoh vs Emilio Nava — Dallas Round of 32

Dallas · ATP · Round of 32
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#192ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#86ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Mmoh M.
7-5 6-2
Nava E.
Mmoh M.
762
Nava E.
520

Michael Mmoh defeated Emilio Nava 7-5 6-2 in the Dallas round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #86.

Key context

  • Match story: Michael Mmoh closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mmoh M.Nava E.
—
Serve
39
—
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.0
7.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (86 vs 189). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
66
52
Break points saved·Even
91
94
Break points won·Clear edge
31
17
Deciding sets·Even
90
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Nava E.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Hard Elo 1599
Surface ELO
5.2+22 Hard Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1613
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
7.1
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Nava E.
Freshness·Even
92
95

Mmoh M.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Nava E.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Paul T.[2]
Giron M.
7-635-76-3
Semi-finals
Paul T.[2]
Shelton B.[3]
6-26-4
Giron M.
Mannarino A.[4]
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Paul T.[2]
Koepfer D.[8]
7-56-3
Mannarino A.[4]
Duckworth J.
6-23-1
Giron M.
Tiafoe F.[1]
6-16-4
Shelton B.[3]
Thompson J.[7]
6-726-46-4
R16
Duckworth J.
Eubanks C.[5]
7-636-4
Thompson J.[7]
Kudla D.
6-16-1
Mannarino A.[4]
Nishioka Y.
W/O
Paul T.[2]
Daniel T.
6-36-2
Shelton B.[3]
Mmoh M.
6-36-3
Koepfer D.[8]
Hijikata R.
6-37-65
Tiafoe F.[1]
Michelsen A.
6-46-3
Giron M.
Purcell M.[6]
6-46-3
R32
Daniel T.
Lestienne C.
4-66-45-0
Nishioka Y.
Atmane T.
7-654-66-3
Hijikata R.
Quinn E.
6-46-4
Giron M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-16-4
Purcell M.[6]
Krueger M.
6-24-67-63
Eubanks C.[5]
Johnson S.
6-16-4
Kudla D.
Albot R.
6-37-63
Koepfer D.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-47-65
Michelsen A.
Sandgren T.
6-33-66-1
Duckworth J.
Svajda Z.
7-636-1
Thompson J.[7]
Neff A.
6-36-1
Mmoh M.
Nava E.
7-56-2