Arthur Fils vs Jakub Mensik — Doha Semi-final

Doha · ATP · Semi-final
Arthur Fils
FRA
Arthur Fils
#24ATP
2001ELO
1930Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$7.9MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2026
hard
Jakub Mensik
CZE6
Jakub Mensik
#18ATP
1931ELO
1893Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$6.9MCAREER
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWL
Fils A.
6-4 7-6
Mensik J.
Fils A.
6772
Mensik J.
4640

Arthur Fils defeated Jakub Mensik 6-4 7-6 in the Doha semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jakub Mensik came in ranked #18. Arthur Fils extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-03-19Miami MastersQFhardJakub Mensik7-6(5) 6-1
2024-12-18Next Gen FinalsRRhardArthur Fils4-2 4-3(4) 4-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Fils A.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Mensik J.

Mensik J.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Fils A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fils A.Mensik J.
56
Serve
42
30
Return
51

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Fils A.Mensik J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
79%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
58%
48%
Service points won·Even
68%
67%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.4
12.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (27 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fils A.Mensik J.
Clutch Rating·Even
89
88
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Slight edge
70
77
Deciding sets·Slight edge
98
92
Tiebreaks·Even
99
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fils A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Mensik J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.8+37 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Hard Elo 1893
6.4Overall Elo 2001
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1931
4.6
H2H
5.4
5.5
Surface form
7.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fils A.Mensik J.
Freshness·Even
88
84

Fils A.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Mensik J.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CClear
Wind 24 km/hHumidity 39%
Final
Alcaraz C.[1]
Fils A.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Alcaraz C.[1]
Rublev A.[5]
7-636-4
Fils A.
Mensik J.[6]
6-47-64
Quarter-finals
Mensik J.[6]
Sinner J.[2]
7-632-66-3
Alcaraz C.[1]
Khachanov K.[7]
6-736-46-3
Fils A.
Lehecka J.[8]
6-36-3
Rublev A.[5]
Tsitsipas S.
6-37-62
R16
Mensik J.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-36-2
Khachanov K.[7]
Fucsovics M.
6-24-66-4
Fils A.
Halys Q.
6-17-67
Sinner J.[2]
Popyrin A.
6-37-5
Rublev A.[5]
Marozsan F.
6-26-4
Lehecka J.[8]
Bergs Z.
6-26-1
Alcaraz C.[1]
Royer V.
6-27-5
Tsitsipas S.
Medvedev D.[4]
6-36-4
R32
Sinner J.[2]
Machac T.
6-16-4
Royer V.
Herbert P.
6-06-3
Tsitsipas S.
Echargui M.
6-46-4
Alcaraz C.[1]
Rinderknech A.
6-47-65
Medvedev D.[4]
Shang J.
6-46-2
Marozsan F.
Humbert U.
6-36-1
Mensik J.[6]
Choinski J.
6-766-26-4
Fucsovics M.
Habib H.
6-36-3
Zhang Z.
Carballes Baena R.
6-46-4
Popyrin A.
Zayid M.
6-06-2
Fils A.
Majchrzak K.
6-756-36-4
Lehecka J.[8]
Brooksby J.
6-36-3
Halys Q.
Carreno Busta P.
4-67-56-3
Khachanov K.[7]
Mochizuki S.
6-13-66-4
Rublev A.[5]
De Jong J.
6-46-3
Bergs Z.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-36-756-4